linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>,
	Ibragimov Rinat <ibragimovrinat@mail.ru>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC]ext4 on 4k-sector drives without read-modify-write support
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 16:05:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110228210541.GF28617@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yq1hbbnoqt2.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 03:19:21PM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> Kind of, yes. But that involves teaching every ATA driver in $LEGACY_OS
> about 4KB logical blocks. There is little value is switching to 4KB
> logical blocks in the first place. So the claim is that it is easier to
> stick with 512-byte addressing, leave the I/O stack intact, and require
> the filesystem to always issue aligned units of 4KB.
> 
> That saves the drive vendors from implementing RMW logic and puts the
> burden on us. Perfect deal.

So it there a reliable way to detect that disk drives that don't have
the Read-Modify-Write logic?  If that can be reflected up the I/O
layer I can have mke2fs enforce that restriction, which currently we
only enforce if the logical blocksize is 4k.

						- Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-28 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-26 18:24 [PATCH][RFC]ext4 on 4k-sector drives without read-modify-write support Ibragimov Rinat
2011-02-28 14:52 ` Jeff Moyer
2011-02-28 14:58   ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-02-28 18:09     ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-28 20:19       ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-02-28 21:05         ` Ted Ts'o [this message]
2011-02-28 21:10           ` Jeff Moyer
2011-02-28 21:22             ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-28 21:57               ` Jeff Moyer
2011-03-01 15:19                 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-02-28 21:20           ` James Bottomley
2011-02-28 21:24             ` Ted Ts'o
2011-02-28 21:23           ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-02-28 22:52       ` [PATCH][RFC]ext4 on 4k-sector drives without read-modify-writesupport Ibragimov Rinat
2011-03-01 22:16       ` Ibragimov Rinat
2011-03-10 17:01         ` Ibragimov Rinat
2011-02-28 17:54   ` [PATCH][RFC]ext4 on 4k-sector drives without read-modify-write support Ibragimov Rinat
2012-09-27 11:41     ` Mike

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110228210541.GF28617@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=ibragimovrinat@mail.ru \
    --cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).