From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bob Copeland Subject: Re: omfs fixes Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:24:47 -0500 Message-ID: <20110304152447.GA14198@hash.localnet> References: <20110303032454.GI22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20110303060352.GK22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <87tyfk7x0c.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <87lj0v9984.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> <20110303225702.GQ22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20110304065542.GT22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds To: Al Viro Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110304065542.GT22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 06:55:42AM +0000, Al Viro wrote: > I've pushed fixes for (b), (c) and (d) into #i_nlink and I think that (a) > needs to be dealt with as well, but that one is less nasty. Bob, do you > prefer that to go through your tree or should it go straight to Linus? > It's in git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/vfs-2.6.git/ i_nlink, Looks great, thanks for the review. I'll go ahead and take them through my tree after a quick run through the test harness. -- Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com