From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josef Bacik Subject: Re: [dm-devel] generic wrappers for multi-device FS operations Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:37:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20110308183709.GC2527@localhost.localdomain> References: <4D766199.4010307@gmail.com> <20110308174308.GP10767@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ric Wheeler , Linux FS Devel , device-mapper development , Karel Zak , Jim Meyering , Chris Mason , Josef Bacik To: Wendy Cheng Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:52721 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753439Ab1CHShV (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:37:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:05:40AM -0800, Wendy Cheng wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 12:04:25PM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote: > >> To make this trivial to do for users, I think that it would be really > >> nice to have a two-level wrappers for things like resize, add a volume, > >> shrink, etc. Similar to the way we have mount or fsck invoke file system > >> specific bits. > >> Good idea? Bad idea? > > > > So the "resize" is on the filesystem, not the volume ? The "grow" part > is probably easy. Unfortunately, the "shrink" may not be easy for some > of the filesystems: > Who wants to make their fs smaller anyway? ;) Josef