From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: stable page writes: wait_on_page_writeback and packet signing Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 02:34:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20110310073453.GA20224@infradead.org> References: <20110309215148.GW15097@dastard> <1299721264.2976.3.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Steve French , Dave Chinner , linux-cifs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel , Mingming Cao , Jeff Layton To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1299721264.2976.3.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-cifs-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 08:41:03PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > So what if the server crashes, or you get some other transient error? I don't think the CIFS world cares. E.g. a Samba in default configuration never even bothers to do a fsync on the underlying server, which to me implies data integrity is not of concern for usual CIFS setups.