From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [2.6.38] Deadlock between rename_lock and vfsmount_lock. Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:18:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20110318131858.GK22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <201103160854.p2G8sR6c077737@www262.sakura.ne.jp> <201103170501.p2H51PjU052428@www262.sakura.ne.jp> <201103181959.CHC73937.SQOLJtVHOMFFOF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> <20110318110603.GG22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20110318120748.GH22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20110318125224.GJ22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: npiggin@kernel.dk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Tetsuo Handa Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:54616 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755758Ab1CRNTA (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Mar 2011 09:19:00 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110318125224.GJ22723@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: See #untested in vfs-2.6.git. I think it should do it, but it *is* completely untested at the moment.