From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [Lsf] Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 05:22:52 -0600 Message-ID: <20110329112252.GO13806@parisc-linux.org> References: <1301373398.2590.20.camel@mulgrave.site> <4D91BF90.8070909@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: James Bottomley , lsf@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , device-mapper development To: Ric Wheeler Return-path: Received: from palinux.external.hp.com ([192.25.206.14]:42218 "EHLO mail.parisc-linux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752782Ab1C2LWz (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2011 07:22:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D91BF90.8070909@redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 07:16:32AM -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote: > (2) Very high speed, low latency SSD devices and testing. Have we settled > on the need for these devices to all have block level drivers? For S-ATA > or SAS devices, are there known performance issues that require > enhancements in somewhere in the stack? I can throw together a quick presentation on this topic. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step."