From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [Lsf] IO less throttling and cgroup aware writeback (Was: Re: Preliminary Agenda and Activities for LSF) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:56:54 -0400 Message-ID: <20110401125654.GA20003@infradead.org> References: <20110330041802.GA20849@dastard> <20110330153757.GD1291@redhat.com> <20110330222002.GB20849@dastard> <20110331141637.GA11139@redhat.com> <1301581251-sup-987@think> <20110331221425.GB2904@dastard> <20110401013424.GA17928@redhat.com> <20110401043605.GA6957@dastard> <20110401063254.GA28242@infradead.org> <20110401072348.GD6957@dastard> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Vivek Goyal , James Bottomley , lsf , linux-fsdevel To: Dave Chinner Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:45291 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753250Ab1DAM5D (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Apr 2011 08:57:03 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110401072348.GD6957@dastard> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 06:23:48PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Oh, I misread the code in _xfs_buf_read that fiddles with > _XBF_RUN_QUEUES. That flag is dead then, as is the XBF_LOG_BUFFER > code which appears to have been superceded by the new XBF_ORDERED > code. Definitely needs cleaning up. Yes, that's been on my todo list for a while, but I first want a sane defintion of REQ_META in the block layer.