From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] NFS: return -EAGAIN when skipped commit in
 nfs_commit_unstable_pages()
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:40:08 -0400
Message-ID: <20110421044008.GD22423@infradead.org>
References: <20110419030003.108796967@intel.com>
 <20110419030532.902141228@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Itaru Kitayama <kitayama@cl.bb4u.ne.jp>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110419030532.902141228@intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:00:09AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> It's probably not sane to return success while redirtying the inode at
> the same time in ->write_inode().

It is not, as it really confuses the writeback code.