From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: buffered writeback torture program Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:41:21 -0400 Message-ID: <20110421174120.GA7267@infradead.org> References: <1303322378-sup-1722@think> <20110421083258.GA26784@infradead.org> <1303407205-sup-6141@think> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4 , xfs , jack , axboe , dchinner To: Chris Mason Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:48989 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752453Ab1DURlW (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:41:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1303407205-sup-6141@think> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 01:34:44PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > Sorry, this doesn't do it. I think that given what a strange special > case this is, we're best off waiting for the IO-less throttling, and > maybe changing the code in xfs/ext4 to be a little more seek aware. Or > maybe not, it has to get written eventually either way. I'm not sure what you mean with seek aware. XFS only clusters additional pages that are in the same extent, and in fact only does so for asynchrononous writeback. Not sure how this should be more seek aware.