From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] SECURITY: Move exec_permission RCU checks into
 security modules
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 11:27:45 -0400
Message-ID: <20110422152745.GB30519@infradead.org>
References: <1303431801-10540-1-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
 <1303431801-10540-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org>
 <20110422043444.GA9038@infradead.org>
 <20110422152520.GB10755@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	npiggin@kernel.dk, shaohua.li@intel.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov,
	jmorris@namei.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110422152520.GB10755@tassilo.jf.intel.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 08:25:20AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > This seems to miss the hunk in fs/namei.c where the LSM hook is called.
> 
> namei.c doesn't need changes because it already passes in the flags
> The changed semantics only "start" in security/security.c

You're right, sorry.