From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] split inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 02:06:42 -0400 Message-ID: <20110427060642.GA11727@infradead.org> References: <20110426144218.GA14862@localhost> <20110426144209.06317674.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Wu Fengguang , Christoph Hellwig , Jan Kara , Mel Gorman , Dave Chinner , Trond Myklebust , Itaru Kitayama , Minchan Kim , LKML , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Memory Management List To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110426144209.06317674.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 02:42:09PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Has this patch been well tested under lockdep? Yes. There's only two places locking two bdis, and both use the bdi_lock_two helper which imposes an ordering, and tells lockdep about it. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org