From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] writeback: introduce wbc.tagged_sync for the WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 11:17:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110502033035.537736600@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110502031750.135798606@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-for-sync.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4449 bytes --]
sync(2) is performed in two stages: the WB_SYNC_NONE sync and the
WB_SYNC_ALL sync. Tag the first stage with wbc.tagged_sync and do
livelock prevention for it, too.
Note that writeback_inodes_sb() is called by not only sync(), they are
treated the same because the other callers need also need livelock
prevention.
Impacts:
- it changes the order in which pages/inodes are synced to disk. Now in
the WB_SYNC_NONE stage, it won't proceed to write the next inode until
finished with the current inode.
- this adds a new field to the writeback trace events and may possibly
break some scripts.
CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
CC: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 4 ++--
fs/fs-writeback.c | 9 +++++----
include/linux/writeback.h | 1 +
mm/page-writeback.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-05-02 11:16:12.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-05-02 11:17:33.000000000 +0800
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ struct wb_writeback_work {
long nr_pages;
struct super_block *sb;
enum writeback_sync_modes sync_mode;
+ unsigned int tagged_sync:1;
unsigned int for_kupdate:1;
unsigned int range_cyclic:1;
unsigned int for_background:1;
@@ -644,6 +645,7 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writ
{
struct writeback_control wbc = {
.sync_mode = work->sync_mode,
+ .tagged_sync = work->tagged_sync,
.older_than_this = NULL,
.for_kupdate = work->for_kupdate,
.for_background = work->for_background,
@@ -651,7 +653,7 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writ
};
unsigned long oldest_jif;
long wrote = 0;
- long write_chunk;
+ long write_chunk = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES;
struct inode *inode;
if (!wbc.range_cyclic) {
@@ -672,9 +674,7 @@ static long wb_writeback(struct bdi_writ
* (quickly) tag currently dirty pages
* (maybe slowly) sync all tagged pages
*/
- if (wbc.sync_mode == WB_SYNC_NONE)
- write_chunk = MAX_WRITEBACK_PAGES;
- else
+ if (wbc.sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc.tagged_sync)
write_chunk = LONG_MAX;
wbc.wb_start = jiffies; /* livelock avoidance */
@@ -1209,6 +1209,7 @@ void writeback_inodes_sb_nr(struct super
struct wb_writeback_work work = {
.sb = sb,
.sync_mode = WB_SYNC_NONE,
+ .tagged_sync = 1,
.done = &done,
.nr_pages = nr,
};
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/writeback.h 2011-05-02 11:16:12.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/writeback.h 2011-05-02 11:17:31.000000000 +0800
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct writeback_control {
unsigned encountered_congestion:1; /* An output: a queue is full */
unsigned for_kupdate:1; /* A kupdate writeback */
unsigned for_background:1; /* A background writeback */
+ unsigned tagged_sync:1; /* do livelock prevention for sync */
unsigned for_reclaim:1; /* Invoked from the page allocator */
unsigned range_cyclic:1; /* range_start is cyclic */
unsigned more_io:1; /* more io to be dispatched */
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-05-02 11:07:57.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-05-02 11:16:12.000000000 +0800
@@ -892,12 +892,12 @@ int write_cache_pages(struct address_spa
range_whole = 1;
cycled = 1; /* ignore range_cyclic tests */
}
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
+ if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_sync)
tag = PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE;
else
tag = PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY;
retry:
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
+ if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_sync)
tag_pages_for_writeback(mapping, index, end);
done_index = index;
while (!done && (index <= end)) {
--- linux-next.orig/fs/ext4/inode.c 2011-05-02 11:07:57.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/ext4/inode.c 2011-05-02 11:16:12.000000000 +0800
@@ -2741,7 +2741,7 @@ static int write_cache_pages_da(struct a
index = wbc->range_start >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
end = wbc->range_end >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
+ if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_sync)
tag = PAGECACHE_TAG_TOWRITE;
else
tag = PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY;
@@ -2975,7 +2975,7 @@ static int ext4_da_writepages(struct add
}
retry:
- if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL)
+ if (wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL || wbc->tagged_sync)
tag_pages_for_writeback(mapping, index, end);
while (!ret && wbc->nr_to_write > 0) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-02 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-02 3:17 [PATCH 0/3] sync livelock fixes v2 Wu Fengguang
2011-05-02 3:17 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-05-04 21:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] writeback: introduce wbc.tagged_sync for the WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage Jan Kara
2011-05-05 12:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-05 13:55 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-05 14:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-02 3:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] writeback: update dirtied_when for synced inode to prevent livelock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-04 21:10 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-05 12:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-02 3:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time Wu Fengguang
2011-05-04 21:24 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-05 12:27 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-05 12:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-05 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-05-05 12:48 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-05 14:01 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-05 14:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-05 14:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-05 14:34 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110502033035.537736600@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).