From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] writeback fixes and trace events Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 20:06:09 +1000 Message-ID: <20110504100609.GE9114@dastard> References: <20110504091707.910929441@intel.com> <20110504094654.GA31151@infradead.org> <20110504095637.GA2101@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , LKML , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" To: Wu Fengguang Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110504095637.GA2101@localhost> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:56:37PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:46:54PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 05:17:07PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > Andrew, > > > > > > Here are one more collection of simple writeback patches. > > > > How does this relate to the other floating writeback patches? We > > really need a proper writeback tree to make any sense of the patch > > queues.. > > These patches are based on the writeback patches already in -mm. > Sorry I should have mentioned it. Does anyone actaully testing filesystems use the -mm tree? I'm pretty sure that no-one in the XFS world does, and I don't think that any ext4 or btrfs folk do, either.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com