linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Cc: "Gao, Yunpeng" <yunpeng.gao@intel.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Is it possible for the ext4/btrfs file system to pass some context related info to low level block driver?
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 12:10:32 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110505181032.GA21360@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <60C31100-5694-4CA9-A778-91CB15915052@dilger.ca>

On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 08:51:39AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> I was aware of REQ_META, but I didn't know there was any benefit to
> using it. I think it would be easy to set REQ_META on all ext4 metadata
> if there was a reason to do so.

The CFQ ioscheduler pays attention to it (prioritising metadata accesses
over data accesses), and blocktrace will print an 'M' for metadata
requests if it's set, so I think that's two excellent reasons to set
REQ_META today.

However, ext3, ext4, and XFS already use it:

fs/ext3/inode.c:1105:   ll_rw_block(READ_META, 1, &bh);
fs/ext3/inode.c:2754:           submit_bh(READ_META, bh);
fs/ext3/namei.c:924:                                    ll_rw_block(READ_META, 1, &bh);
fs/ext4/inode.c:1500:   ll_rw_block(READ_META, 1, &bh);
fs/ext4/inode.c:4775:           submit_bh(READ_META, bh);
fs/ext4/namei.c:924:                                    ll_rw_block(READ_META, 1, &bh);
fs/gfs2/log.c:597:              submit_bh(WRITE_SYNC | REQ_META, bh);
fs/gfs2/log.c:599:              submit_bh(WRITE_FLUSH_FUA | REQ_META, bh);
fs/gfs2/meta_io.c:39:   int write_op = REQ_META |
fs/gfs2/meta_io.c:228:  submit_bh(READ_SYNC | REQ_META, bh);
fs/gfs2/meta_io.c:435:          ll_rw_block(READ_SYNC | REQ_META, 1, &first_bh);
fs/gfs2/ops_fstype.c:221:       submit_bio(READ_SYNC | REQ_META, bio);
fs/gfs2/quota.c:710:            ll_rw_block(READ_META, 1, &bh);
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_buf.c:1321:                rw = (bp->b_flags & XBF_WRITE) ? WRITE_META : READ_META;
include/linux/fs.h:164:#define READ_META                (READ | REQ_META)
include/linux/fs.h:168:#define WRITE_META               (WRITE | REQ_META)

btrfs seems to not use REQ_META yet.  *poke* *poke* :-)

-- 
Matthew Wilcox				Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-05 18:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-03  2:44 Is it possible for the ext4/btrfs file system to pass some context related info to low level block driver? Gao, Yunpeng
2011-05-03  4:10 ` Kyungmin Park
2011-05-04 10:31   ` Gao, Yunpeng
2011-05-03 13:43 ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-05-04 11:45   ` Gao, Yunpeng
2011-05-04 14:51     ` Andreas Dilger
2011-05-05 18:10       ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2011-05-05 20:11         ` Andreas Dilger
2011-05-09  5:50       ` Gao, Yunpeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110505181032.GA21360@parisc-linux.org \
    --to=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=yunpeng.gao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).