From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] writeback: introduce .tagged_sync for the
 WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage
Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 05:17:29 +0800
Message-ID: <20110519211729.GA19304@localhost>
References: <20110512135706.937596128@intel.com>
 <20110512140030.759385136@intel.com>
 <20110512224013.GH19446@dastard>
 <20110513025607.GA8016@localhost>
 <20110515234306.GO19446@dastard>
 <20110516053946.GA10776@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110516053946.GA10776@localhost>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

> shall we rename .tagged_sync to .tagged_write?

FYI, I finally renamed the flag to .tagged_writepages which most
precisely describes what it's doing.