From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 15/18] writeback: trace event writeback_single_inode
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 13:14:26 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110524051900.090199036@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110524051411.924582719@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: writeback-trace-writeback_single_inode.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4032 bytes --]
It is valuable to know how the dirty inodes are iterated and their IO size.
"writeback_single_inode: bdi 8:0: ino=134246746 state=I_DIRTY_SYNC|I_SYNC age=414 index=0 to_write=1024 wrote=0"
- "state" reflects inode->i_state at the end of writeback_single_inode()
- "index" reflects mapping->writeback_index after the ->writepages() call
- "to_write" is the wbc->nr_to_write at entrance of writeback_single_inode()
- "wrote" is the number of pages actually written
v2: add trace event writeback_single_inode_requeue as proposed by Dave.
CC: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 4 +
include/trace/events/writeback.h | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2011-05-24 11:17:25.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/trace/events/writeback.h 2011-05-24 11:17:26.000000000 +0800
@@ -8,6 +8,19 @@
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/writeback.h>
+#define show_inode_state(state) \
+ __print_flags(state, "|", \
+ {I_DIRTY_SYNC, "I_DIRTY_SYNC"}, \
+ {I_DIRTY_DATASYNC, "I_DIRTY_DATASYNC"}, \
+ {I_DIRTY_PAGES, "I_DIRTY_PAGES"}, \
+ {I_NEW, "I_NEW"}, \
+ {I_WILL_FREE, "I_WILL_FREE"}, \
+ {I_FREEING, "I_FREEING"}, \
+ {I_CLEAR, "I_CLEAR"}, \
+ {I_SYNC, "I_SYNC"}, \
+ {I_REFERENCED, "I_REFERENCED"} \
+ )
+
struct wb_writeback_work;
DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_work_class,
@@ -184,6 +197,63 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(writeback_congest_waited_te
TP_ARGS(usec_timeout, usec_delayed)
);
+DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(writeback_single_inode_template,
+
+ TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode,
+ struct writeback_control *wbc,
+ unsigned long nr_to_write
+ ),
+
+ TP_ARGS(inode, wbc, nr_to_write),
+
+ TP_STRUCT__entry(
+ __array(char, name, 32)
+ __field(unsigned long, ino)
+ __field(unsigned long, state)
+ __field(unsigned long, age)
+ __field(unsigned long, writeback_index)
+ __field(long, nr_to_write)
+ __field(unsigned long, wrote)
+ ),
+
+ TP_fast_assign(
+ strncpy(__entry->name,
+ dev_name(inode->i_mapping->backing_dev_info->dev), 32);
+ __entry->ino = inode->i_ino;
+ __entry->state = inode->i_state;
+ __entry->age = (jiffies - inode->dirtied_when) *
+ 1000 / HZ;
+ __entry->writeback_index = inode->i_mapping->writeback_index;
+ __entry->nr_to_write = nr_to_write;
+ __entry->wrote = nr_to_write - wbc->nr_to_write;
+ ),
+
+ TP_printk("bdi %s: ino=%lu state=%s age=%lu "
+ "index=%lu to_write=%ld wrote=%lu",
+ __entry->name,
+ __entry->ino,
+ show_inode_state(__entry->state),
+ __entry->age,
+ __entry->writeback_index,
+ __entry->nr_to_write,
+ __entry->wrote
+ )
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(writeback_single_inode_template, writeback_single_inode_requeue,
+ TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode,
+ struct writeback_control *wbc,
+ unsigned long nr_to_write),
+ TP_ARGS(inode, wbc, nr_to_write)
+);
+
+DEFINE_EVENT(writeback_single_inode_template, writeback_single_inode,
+ TP_PROTO(struct inode *inode,
+ struct writeback_control *wbc,
+ unsigned long nr_to_write),
+ TP_ARGS(inode, wbc, nr_to_write)
+);
+
#endif /* _TRACE_WRITEBACK_H */
/* This part must be outside protection */
--- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-05-24 11:17:25.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-05-24 11:17:26.000000000 +0800
@@ -346,6 +346,7 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
+ long nr_to_write = wbc->nr_to_write;
unsigned dirty;
int ret;
@@ -368,6 +369,8 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
*/
if (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) {
requeue_io(inode, wb);
+ trace_writeback_single_inode_requeue(inode, wbc,
+ nr_to_write);
return 0;
}
@@ -467,6 +470,7 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *ino
}
}
inode_sync_complete(inode);
+ trace_writeback_single_inode(inode, wbc, nr_to_write);
return ret;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-24 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 5:14 [PATCH 00/18] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 (v4) Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 01/18] writeback: introduce .tagged_writepages for the WB_SYNC_NONE sync stage Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 02/18] writeback: update dirtied_when for synced inode to prevent livelock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 03/18] writeback: introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 04/18] writeback: try more writeback as long as something was written Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 05/18] writeback: the kupdate expire timestamp should be a moving target Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 06/18] writeback: sync expired inodes first in background writeback Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 15:52 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-25 14:38 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-26 23:10 ` Jan Kara
2011-05-27 15:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-27 15:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 07/18] writeback: refill b_io iff empty Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 08/18] writeback: split inode_wb_list_lock into bdi_writeback.list_lock Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 09/18] writeback: elevate queue_io() into wb_writeback() Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 10/18] writeback: avoid extra sync work at enqueue time Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 11/18] writeback: add bdi_dirty_limit() kernel-doc Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 12/18] writeback: skip balance_dirty_pages() for in-memory fs Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 13/18] writeback: remove writeback_control.more_io Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 14/18] writeback: remove .nonblocking and .encountered_congestion Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 16/18] writeback: trace event writeback_queue_io Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 17/18] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight Wu Fengguang
2011-05-24 5:14 ` [PATCH 18/18] writeback: rearrange the wb_writeback() loop Wu Fengguang
2011-05-29 7:34 ` [PATCH 00/18] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 (v4) Sedat Dilek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110524051900.090199036@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).