From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: (Short?) merge window reminder Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:46:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20110524154626.GD30117@linux-mips.org> References: <20110523192056.GC23629@elte.hu> <20110523231721.GM10009@thunk.org> <4DDAEC68.30803@zytor.com> <20110524154348.27ba649d@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jacek Luczak , Jan Engelhardt , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, "Ted Ts'o" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , DRI , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-fsdevel , Linus Torvalds To: Alan Cox Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110524154348.27ba649d@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 03:43:48PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > Can we drop most of MCA, EISA and ISA bus if we are going to have a big > version change ? A driver spring clean is much overdue and it's all in > git in case someone wishes to sneak out at midnight and bring some crawly > horror back from the dead. Dunno about MCA but I doubt we can kill all of (E)ISA. i8253, i8259 and a few others still refuse hard to die. Is it worth to setup a system to track success / failure reports for drivers and ditch drivers once there are no success reports for a driver for too long? It may not be a good idea - people tend not report success much more rarely than failure. (On that matter, I wonder if there are 5.25" USB floppy drives ...) Ralf