[PATCH 2/3] VFS: Remove dentry->d_lock locking from shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree()

[David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>]

Locks of the dcache_lock were replaced by locks of dentry->d_lock in commits
such as:

	2304450783dfde7b0b94ae234edd0dbffa865073
	2fd6b7f50797f2e993eea59e0a0b8c6399c811dc

as part of the RCU-based pathwalk changes, despite the fact that the caller
(shrink_dcache_for_umount()) notes in the banner comment the reasons that
d_lock is not necessary in these functions:

/*
 * destroy the dentries attached to a superblock on unmounting
 * - we don't need to use dentry->d_lock because:
 *   - the superblock is detached from all mountings and open files, so the
 *     dentry trees will not be rearranged by the VFS
 *   - s_umount is write-locked, so the memory pressure shrinker will ignore
 *     any dentries belonging to this superblock that it comes across
 *   - the filesystem itself is no longer permitted to rearrange the dentries
 *     in this superblock
 */

So remove these locks.  If the locks are actually necessary, then this banner
comment should be altered instead.

The hash table chains are protected by 1-bit locks in the hash table heads, so
those shouldn't be a problem.

Note that to make this work, __d_drop() has to be split so that the RCUwalk
barrier can be avoided.  This causes problems otherwise as it has an assertion
that dentry->d_lock is locked - but there is no need for that as no one else
can be trying to access this dentry, except to step over it (and that should
be handled by d_free(), I think).

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
---

 fs/dcache.c |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/dcache.c b/fs/dcache.c
index 9e02c6c..ed1e691 100644
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@ -301,6 +301,27 @@ static struct dentry *d_kill(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
 	return parent;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Unhash a dentry without inserting an RCU walk barrier or checking that
+ * dentry->d_lock is locked.  The caller must take care of that, if
+ * appropriate.
+ */
+static void __d_shrink(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+	if (!d_unhashed(dentry)) {
+		struct hlist_bl_head *b;
+		if (unlikely(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_DISCONNECTED))
+			b = &dentry->d_sb->s_anon;
+		else
+			b = d_hash(dentry->d_parent, dentry->d_name.hash);
+
+		hlist_bl_lock(b);
+		__hlist_bl_del(&dentry->d_hash);
+		dentry->d_hash.pprev = NULL;
+		hlist_bl_unlock(b);
+	}
+}
+
 /**
  * d_drop - drop a dentry
  * @dentry: dentry to drop
@@ -319,17 +340,7 @@ static struct dentry *d_kill(struct dentry *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
 void __d_drop(struct dentry *dentry)
 {
 	if (!d_unhashed(dentry)) {
-		struct hlist_bl_head *b;
-		if (unlikely(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_DISCONNECTED))
-			b = &dentry->d_sb->s_anon;
-		else
-			b = d_hash(dentry->d_parent, dentry->d_name.hash);
-
-		hlist_bl_lock(b);
-		__hlist_bl_del(&dentry->d_hash);
-		dentry->d_hash.pprev = NULL;
-		hlist_bl_unlock(b);
-
+		__d_shrink(dentry);
 		dentry_rcuwalk_barrier(dentry);
 	}
 }
@@ -877,10 +888,8 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree(struct dentry *dentry)
 	BUG_ON(!IS_ROOT(dentry));
 
 	/* detach this root from the system */
-	spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
 	dentry_lru_del(dentry);
-	__d_drop(dentry);
-	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
+	__d_shrink(dentry);
 
 	for (;;) {
 		/* descend to the first leaf in the current subtree */
@@ -889,16 +898,11 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree(struct dentry *dentry)
 
 			/* this is a branch with children - detach all of them
 			 * from the system in one go */
-			spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
 			list_for_each_entry(loop, &dentry->d_subdirs,
 					    d_u.d_child) {
-				spin_lock_nested(&loop->d_lock,
-						DENTRY_D_LOCK_NESTED);
 				dentry_lru_del(loop);
-				__d_drop(loop);
-				spin_unlock(&loop->d_lock);
+				__d_shrink(loop);
 			}
-			spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 
 			/* move to the first child */
 			dentry = list_entry(dentry->d_subdirs.next,
@@ -930,10 +934,8 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree(struct dentry *dentry)
 				list_del(&dentry->d_u.d_child);
 			} else {
 				parent = dentry->d_parent;
-				spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
 				parent->d_count--;
 				list_del(&dentry->d_u.d_child);
-				spin_unlock(&parent->d_lock);
 			}
 
 			inode = dentry->d_inode;
@@ -980,9 +982,7 @@ void shrink_dcache_for_umount(struct super_block *sb)
 
 	dentry = sb->s_root;
 	sb->s_root = NULL;
-	spin_lock(&dentry->d_lock);
 	dentry->d_count--;
-	spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
 	shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree(dentry);
 
 	while (!hlist_bl_empty(&sb->s_anon)) {