From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: writeback merge status, was Re: [PATCH 00/18] writeback fixes and cleanups for 2.6.40 (v3) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 13:15:12 -0700 Message-ID: <20110607131512.bf27eb68.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20110519214530.939830917@intel.com> <20110523090739.GA27894@infradead.org> <20110523092838.GA25829@localhost> <20110524032859.GA17429@localhost> <20110601153142.0bf83332.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110602022919.GB6015@localhost> <20110607121335.GA14080@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wu Fengguang , Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , torvalds@linux-foundation.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110607121335.GA14080@infradead.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 08:13:36 -0400 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It looks like we once again got no writeback fixes merged for $NEXT, > even with Wu having a very nice, well reviewed and tested series of > fairly trivial patches. We're waiting for the v4 series: : I'll rearrange the series and move patch 14 to the end, so that the : patches come in order : : - 10 (updated) patches in -mm : - 6 more trivial patches that is safe to go upstream after -rc1 : - the current patch 14 and patch 16 (that depends on 14)