From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wu Fengguang Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/15] writeback fixes and cleanups for 3.0 (v5) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:18:25 +0800 Message-ID: <20110609021825.GA5313@localhost> References: <20110607213236.634026193@intel.com> <20110607160441.db475211.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110608020102.GA29239@localhost> <20110608134510.GA10273@localhost> <20110609111609.45848768.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , "sedat.dilek@gmail.com" To: Stephen Rothwell Return-path: Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:47332 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751705Ab1FICS3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2011 22:18:29 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110609111609.45848768.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Stephen, On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 09:16:09AM +0800, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 21:45:10 +0800 Wu Fengguang wrote: > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/writeback.git#fs-writeback > > > > Will you include this branch instead? It looks more reasonable as > > suggested by Sedat: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/writeback.git next > > I have added that tree starting today with just you as the contact > (please let me know if others should be added as contacts as well). Thank you! > Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next. As > you may know, this is not a judgment of your code. The purpose of > linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of > conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. > > You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have > been: > * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's > Signed-off-by, > * posted to the relevant mailing list, > * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree), > * successfully unit tested, and > * destined for the current or next Linux merge window. > > Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him > to fetch). It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary. OK. Thanks, Fengguang