linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org"
	<bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org>,
	"daaugusto@gmail.com" <daaugusto@gmail.com>,
	"kernel-bugzilla@cygnusx-1.org" <kernel-bugzilla@cygnusx-1.org>,
	"listposter@gmail.com" <listposter@gmail.com>,
	"justincase@yopmail.com" <justincase@yopmail.com>,
	"clopez@igalia.com" <clopez@igalia.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug 18632] "INFO: task" dpkg "blocked for more than 120 seconds.
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 17:09:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110609090906.GA19186@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110609082718.GA10335@infradead.org>

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:27:18PM +0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 11:54:26AM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Oh it's not sync(1) in Carlos' case, but random commands like man/dd
> > as well as
> > 
> >         task xfssyncd:451 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> > 
> > It looks more like XFS related livelock, because I ran into similar
> > problem in a very simple XFS setup on some plain disk partition.
> 
> Care to explain what issues you saw, and with what setup and kernel
> version?  Also usually the task blocked more than 120 seconds display
> should come with a stacktrace, how does it look like?

I have a sync livelock test script and it sometimes livelocked on XFS
even with the livelock fix patches. Ext4 is always OK.

[ 3581.181253] sync            D ffff8800b6ca15d8  4560  4403   4392 0x00000000
[ 3581.181734]  ffff88006f775bc8 0000000000000046 ffff8800b6ca12b8 00000001b6ca1938
[ 3581.182411]  ffff88006f774000 00000000001d2e40 00000000001d2e40 ffff8800b6ca1280
[ 3581.183088]  00000000001d2e40 ffff88006f775fd8 00000340af111ef2 00000000001d2e40
[ 3581.183765] Call Trace:
[ 3581.184008]  [<ffffffff8109be73>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0xa3/0xab
[ 3581.184392]  [<ffffffff8108cc0d>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x6c/0x79
[ 3581.184756]  [<ffffffff8108cc0d>] ? prepare_to_wait+0x6c/0x79
[ 3581.185120]  [<ffffffff812ed520>] xfs_ioend_wait+0x87/0x9f
[ 3581.185474]  [<ffffffff8108c97a>] ? wake_up_bit+0x2a/0x2a
[ 3581.185827]  [<ffffffff812f742a>] xfs_sync_inode_data+0x92/0x9d
[ 3581.186198]  [<ffffffff812f76e2>] xfs_inode_ag_walk+0x1a5/0x287
[ 3581.186569]  [<ffffffff812f779b>] ? xfs_inode_ag_walk+0x25e/0x287
[ 3581.186946]  [<ffffffff812f7398>] ? xfs_sync_worker+0x69/0x69
[ 3581.187311]  [<ffffffff812e2354>] ? xfs_perag_get+0x68/0xd0
[ 3581.187669]  [<ffffffff81092175>] ? local_clock+0x41/0x5a
[ 3581.188020]  [<ffffffff8109be73>] ? lock_release_holdtime+0xa3/0xab
[ 3581.188403]  [<ffffffff812e22ec>] ? xfs_check_sizes+0x160/0x160
[ 3581.188773]  [<ffffffff812e2354>] ? xfs_perag_get+0x68/0xd0
[ 3581.189130]  [<ffffffff812e236c>] ? xfs_perag_get+0x80/0xd0
[ 3581.189488]  [<ffffffff812e22ec>] ? xfs_check_sizes+0x160/0x160
[ 3581.189858]  [<ffffffff812f7831>] ? xfs_inode_ag_iterator+0x6d/0x8f
[ 3581.190241]  [<ffffffff812f7398>] ? xfs_sync_worker+0x69/0x69
[ 3581.190606]  [<ffffffff812f780b>] xfs_inode_ag_iterator+0x47/0x8f
[ 3581.190982]  [<ffffffff811611f5>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x7a/0x7a
[ 3581.191352]  [<ffffffff812f7877>] xfs_sync_data+0x24/0x43
[ 3581.191703]  [<ffffffff812f7911>] xfs_quiesce_data+0x2c/0x88
[ 3581.192065]  [<ffffffff812f5556>] xfs_fs_sync_fs+0x21/0x48
[ 3581.192419]  [<ffffffff811611e1>] __sync_filesystem+0x66/0x7a
[ 3581.192783]  [<ffffffff8116120b>] sync_one_sb+0x16/0x18
[ 3581.193128]  [<ffffffff8113e3e3>] iterate_supers+0x72/0xce
[ 3581.193482]  [<ffffffff81161140>] sync_filesystems+0x20/0x22
[ 3581.193842]  [<ffffffff8116127e>] sys_sync+0x21/0x33
[ 3581.194177]  [<ffffffff819016c2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

I just reconfirmed the problem on 3.0-rc2 with/without the livelock
fix patches (writeback fixes and cleanups v5 at http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/7/569),
and find that situation has improved for XFS. It still has much longer
sync time than ext4, however won't stuck until dd exits.

root@fat /home/wfg# ./sync-livelock.sh

3.0-rc2, xfs:

        sync time: 20
        sync time: 26
        sync time: 27

3.0-rc2, ext4:
        sync time: 4
        sync time: 4
        sync time: 3

3.0-rc2 with livelock fix patches, xfs:
        sync time: 18
        sync time: 21
        sync time: 14
        sync time: 20
        sync time: 21

Thanks,
Fengguang
---
$ cat ./sync-livelock.sh
#!/bin/sh

umount /dev/sda7
mkfs.xfs -f /dev/sda7
# mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda7
# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda7
mount /dev/sda7 /fs

echo $((50<<20)) > /proc/sys/vm/dirty_bytes

pid=
for i in `seq 10`
do     
        dd if=/dev/zero of=/fs/zero-$i bs=1M count=1000 &
        pid="$pid $!"
done

sleep 1

tic=$(date +'%s')
sync
tac=$(date +'%s')

echo
echo sync time: $((tac-tic))
egrep '(Dirty|Writeback|NFS_Unstable)' /proc/meminfo

pidof dd > /dev/null && { kill -9 $pid; echo sync NOT livelocked; }

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-09  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-18632-27@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
     [not found] ` <201106082138.p58Lchgj002615@demeter2.kernel.org>
     [not found]   ` <20110608150241.8412a63d.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2011-06-09  3:32     ` [Bug 18632] "INFO: task" dpkg "blocked for more than 120 seconds Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09  3:54       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09  8:27         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-09  9:09           ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-06-09 11:02             ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-09 12:11               ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 12:17                 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 12:17                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-09 12:43                   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 13:23                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-10  3:21                       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:56                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-19 16:33                           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-09 13:56                     ` Tao Ma
2011-06-09 14:12                 ` Tao Ma
2011-06-09 14:21                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-09 14:32                     ` Vivek Goyal
2011-06-09 14:51                       ` Tao Ma

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110609090906.GA19186@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=clopez@igalia.com \
    --cc=daaugusto@gmail.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=justincase@yopmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-bugzilla@cygnusx-1.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=listposter@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).