From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>,
dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu
Subject: Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH][-rc3] Define a consolidated definition of node_start/end_pfn for build error in page_cgroup.c (Was Re: mmotm 2011-06-15-16-56 uploaded (mm/page_cgroup.c)
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 08:57:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110617075743.GD5244@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110617094628.aecf5ee1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:46:28AM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:35:59 +0100
> Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
>
> > A caller that does node_end_pfn(nid++) will get a nasty surprise
> > due to side-effects. I know architectures currently get this wrong
> > including x86_64 but we might as well fix it up now. The definition
> > in arch/x86/include/asm/mmzone_32.h is immune to side-effects and
> > might be a better choice despite the use of a temporary variable.
> >
>
> Ok, here is a fixed one. Thank you for comments/review.
> ==
> From 507cc95c5ba2351bff16c5421255d1395a3b555b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:28:07 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] Fix node_start/end_pfn() definition for mm/page_cgroup.c
>
> commit 21a3c96 uses node_start/end_pfn(nid) for detection start/end
> of nodes. But, it's not defined in linux/mmzone.h but defined in
> /arch/???/include/mmzone.h which is included only under
> CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES=y.
>
> Then, we see
> mm/page_cgroup.c: In function 'page_cgroup_init':
> mm/page_cgroup.c:308: error: implicit declaration of function 'node_start_pfn'
> mm/page_cgroup.c:309: error: implicit declaration of function 'node_end_pfn'
>
> So, fixiing page_cgroup.c is an idea...
>
> But node_start_pfn()/node_end_pfn() is a very generic macro and
> should be implemented in the same manner for all archs.
> (m32r has different implementation...)
>
> This patch removes definitions of node_start/end_pfn() in each archs
> and defines a unified one in linux/mmzone.h. It's not under
> CONFIG_NEED_MULTIPLE_NODES, now.
>
> A result of macro expansion is here (mm/page_cgroup.c)
>
> for !NUMA
> start_pfn = ((&contig_page_data)->node_start_pfn);
> end_pfn = ({ pg_data_t *__pgdat = (&contig_page_data); __pgdat->node_start_pfn + __pgdat->node_spanned_pages;});
>
> for NUMA (x86-64)
> start_pfn = ((node_data[nid])->node_start_pfn);
> end_pfn = ({ pg_data_t *__pgdat = (node_data[nid]); __pgdat->node_start_pfn + __pgdat->node_spanned_pages;});
>
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
Thanks.
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 7:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 23:56 mmotm 2011-06-15-16-56 uploaded akpm
2011-06-16 1:29 ` mmotm 2011-06-15-16-56 uploaded (UML build error) Randy Dunlap
2011-06-16 4:44 ` mmotm 2011-06-15-16-56 uploaded (mm/migrate) Randy Dunlap
2011-06-16 4:49 ` mmotm 2011-06-15-16-56 uploaded (mm/page_cgroup.c) Randy Dunlap
2011-06-16 5:48 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-16 8:28 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-16 10:35 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-16 16:25 ` Dave Hansen
2011-06-16 16:51 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-16 18:46 ` Dave Hansen
2011-06-17 7:55 ` Mel Gorman
2011-06-17 0:46 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH][-rc3] Define a consolidated definition of node_start/end_pfn for build error in page_cgroup.c (Was " KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2011-06-17 7:57 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-06-17 16:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-06-20 16:38 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110617075743.GD5244@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).