linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 11:35:36 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110619153536.GB20424@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110619150510.484877943@intel.com>

I'd rather see this earlier in the series, before the write bandwith
estimation ones, as it's groundwork independ of those changes.

> +		if (wrote) {
> +			if (jiffies - start_time > HZ / 10UL)
> +				break;
> +			if (work->nr_pages <= 0)
> +				break;
> +		}

This code probably wants some comments.

>  static void bdi_flush_io(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
>  {
> -	struct writeback_control wbc = {
> -		.sync_mode		= WB_SYNC_NONE,
> -		.older_than_this	= NULL,
> -		.range_cyclic		= 1,
> -		.nr_to_write		= 1024,
> -	};
> -
> -	writeback_inodes_wb(&bdi->wb, &wbc);
> +	writeback_inodes_wb(&bdi->wb, 1024);
>  }

At this point you could probably also kill the bdi_flush_io wrapper, and
just call writeback_inodes_wb directly.  A comment on the 1024 pages to
write would be nice, if you remember it from poking the code.  I can't
find any good explanation for it offhand.


  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-19 15:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-19 15:01 [PATCH 0/7] more writeback patches for 3.1 Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] writeback: consolidate variable names in balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-06-20  7:45   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 2/7] writeback: add parameters to __bdi_update_bandwidth() Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-19 15:35     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] writeback: introduce smoothed global dirty limit Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:36   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-19 15:55     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-21 23:59       ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 14:11         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-20 21:18   ` Jan Kara
2011-06-21 14:24     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-22  0:04   ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 14:24     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 4/7] writeback: introduce max-pause and pass-good dirty limits Wu Fengguang
2011-06-22  0:20   ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-23 13:18     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:35   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-06-19 16:14     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 6/7] writeback: scale IO chunk size up to half device bandwidth Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 7/7] writeback: timestamp based bdi dirty_exceeded state Wu Fengguang
2011-06-20 20:09   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-21 10:00     ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-06-20 21:38   ` Jan Kara
2011-06-21 15:07     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-21 21:14       ` Jan Kara
2011-06-22 14:37         ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110619153536.GB20424@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).