From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
swhiteho@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] writeback: timestamp based bdi dirty_exceeded state
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:09:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110620200950.GA18537@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110619150510.717948499@intel.com>
On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:01:15PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> When there are only one (or several) dirtiers, dirty_exceeded is always
> (or mostly) off. Converting to timestamp avoids this problem. It helps
> to use smaller write_chunk for smoother throttling.
In current mainline gfs2 has grown a non-trivial reference to
backing_dev_info.dirty_exceeded, which needs to be dealt with.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> ---
>
> Before patch, the wait time in balance_dirty_pages() are ~200ms:
>
> [ 1093.397700] write_bandwidth: comm=swapper pages=1536 time=204ms
> [ 1093.594319] write_bandwidth: comm=swapper pages=1536 time=196ms
> [ 1093.796642] write_bandwidth: comm=swapper pages=1536 time=200ms
>
> After patch, ~25ms:
>
> [ 90.261339] write_bandwidth: comm=swapper pages=192 time=20ms
> [ 90.293168] write_bandwidth: comm=swapper pages=192 time=24ms
> [ 90.323853] write_bandwidth: comm=swapper pages=192 time=24ms
> [ 90.354510] write_bandwidth: comm=swapper pages=192 time=28ms
> [ 90.389890] write_bandwidth: comm=swapper pages=192 time=28ms
> [ 90.421787] write_bandwidth: comm=swapper pages=192 time=24ms
>
> include/linux/backing-dev.h | 2 +-
> mm/backing-dev.c | 2 --
> mm/page-writeback.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-06-19 22:59:49.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-06-19 22:59:53.000000000 +0800
> @@ -483,6 +483,15 @@ unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct bac
> return bdi_dirty;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * last time exceeded (limit - limit/DIRTY_BRAKE)
> + */
> +static bool dirty_exceeded_recently(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> + unsigned long time_window)
> +{
> + return jiffies - bdi->dirty_exceed_time <= time_window;
> +}
> +
> static void bdi_update_write_bandwidth(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
> unsigned long elapsed,
> unsigned long written)
> @@ -621,7 +630,6 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
> unsigned long bdi_thresh;
> unsigned long pages_written = 0;
> unsigned long pause = 1;
> - bool dirty_exceeded = false;
> struct backing_dev_info *bdi = mapping->backing_dev_info;
> unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
>
> @@ -669,14 +677,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
> * bdi or process from holding back light ones; The latter is
> * the last resort safeguard.
> */
> - dirty_exceeded = (bdi_dirty > bdi_thresh) ||
> - (nr_dirty > dirty_thresh);
> -
> - if (!dirty_exceeded)
> + if (bdi_dirty <= bdi_thresh && nr_dirty <= dirty_thresh)
> break;
> -
> - if (!bdi->dirty_exceeded)
> - bdi->dirty_exceeded = 1;
> + bdi->dirty_exceed_time = jiffies;
>
> bdi_update_bandwidth(bdi, dirty_thresh, nr_dirty, bdi_dirty,
> start_time);
> @@ -719,9 +722,6 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
> pause = HZ / 10;
> }
>
> - if (!dirty_exceeded && bdi->dirty_exceeded)
> - bdi->dirty_exceeded = 0;
> -
> if (writeback_in_progress(bdi))
> return;
>
> @@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
> return;
>
> ratelimit = ratelimit_pages;
> - if (mapping->backing_dev_info->dirty_exceeded)
> + if (dirty_exceeded_recently(bdi, MAX_PAUSE))
> ratelimit = 8;
>
> /*
> --- linux-next.orig/include/linux/backing-dev.h 2011-06-19 22:54:58.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/include/linux/backing-dev.h 2011-06-19 22:59:53.000000000 +0800
> @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ struct backing_dev_info {
> unsigned long avg_write_bandwidth;
>
> struct prop_local_percpu completions;
> - int dirty_exceeded;
> + unsigned long dirty_exceed_time;
>
> unsigned int min_ratio;
> unsigned int max_ratio, max_prop_frac;
> --- linux-next.orig/mm/backing-dev.c 2011-06-19 22:59:49.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/mm/backing-dev.c 2011-06-19 22:59:53.000000000 +0800
> @@ -670,8 +670,6 @@ int bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bd
> goto err;
> }
>
> - bdi->dirty_exceeded = 0;
> -
> bdi->bw_time_stamp = jiffies;
> bdi->written_stamp = 0;
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
---end quoted text---
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-20 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-19 15:01 [PATCH 0/7] more writeback patches for 3.1 Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 1/7] writeback: consolidate variable names in balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-06-20 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 2/7] writeback: add parameters to __bdi_update_bandwidth() Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-19 15:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 3/7] writeback: introduce smoothed global dirty limit Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-19 15:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-21 23:59 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-20 21:18 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-21 14:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-22 0:04 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-22 14:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 4/7] writeback: introduce max-pause and pass-good dirty limits Wu Fengguang
2011-06-22 0:20 ` Andrew Morton
2011-06-23 13:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 5/7] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-19 16:14 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 6/7] writeback: scale IO chunk size up to half device bandwidth Wu Fengguang
2011-06-19 15:01 ` [PATCH 7/7] writeback: timestamp based bdi dirty_exceeded state Wu Fengguang
2011-06-20 20:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-06-21 10:00 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-06-20 21:38 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-21 15:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-21 21:14 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-22 14:37 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110620200950.GA18537@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).