From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, mfasheh@suse.com,
jlbec@evilplan.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] far: remove i_alloc_sem abuse
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 12:09:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110621160942.GA878@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fwn3mb2g.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp>
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:57:43AM +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes:
>
> > Add a new rw_semaphore to protect bmap against truncate. Previous
> > i_alloc_sem was abused for this, but it's going away in this series.
>
> In FAT case, ->i_mutex was better. But, last time I saw, shmfs was using
> ->i_mutex to call ->bmap. So, this was chosen instead.
>
> I'm not checking current version yet though, if shmfs had change, we can
> use ->i_mutex.
I tried that first, but it gives an instant deadlock when using a
swapfile on fat.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-21 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-20 20:15 [PATCH 0/8] remove i_alloc_sem Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-20 20:15 ` [PATCH 1/8] far: remove i_alloc_sem abuse Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-21 15:57 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-06-21 16:09 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2011-06-21 16:09 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-06-20 20:15 ` [PATCH 2/8] ext4: " Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-21 16:34 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-21 16:48 ` Lukas Czerner
2011-06-21 17:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-20 20:15 ` [PATCH 3/8] fs: simpler handling of zero sized reads in __blockdev_direct_IO Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-20 20:15 ` [PATCH 4/8] fs: kill i_alloc_sem Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-20 21:32 ` Joel Becker
2011-06-20 22:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-01 2:58 ` Joel Becker
2011-06-21 5:40 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-21 9:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-20 20:15 ` [PATCH 5/8] fs: move inode_dio_wait calls into ->setattr Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-20 20:15 ` [PATCH 6/8] fs: always maintain i_dio_count Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-20 21:29 ` Joel Becker
2011-06-20 22:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-20 20:15 ` [PATCH 7/8] btrfs: wait for direct I/O requests in truncate Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-20 20:15 ` [PATCH 8/8] rw_semaphore: remove up/down_read_non_owner Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-20 20:32 ` [PATCH 0/8] remove i_alloc_sem Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-21 23:54 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-22 9:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-22 14:22 ` Ted Ts'o
2011-06-22 18:13 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-23 10:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110621160942.GA878@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp \
--cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).