From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ted Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] remove i_alloc_sem Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:22:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20110622142235.GN32133@thunk.org> References: <20110620201533.847236272@bombadil.infradead.org> <20110621235425.GA24067@quack.suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp, mfasheh@suse.com, jlbec@evilplan.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110621235425.GA24067@quack.suse.cz> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 01:54:25AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > ext4_page_mkwrite()... Ted, what happened to that patch. Should I resend > it? So assuming I fix the refcounting issue in fs/ext4/page_io.c (which I will do not dropping the page's refcount until after the workqueue finishes its job), does your patch need changing, or is it a matter of fixing the commit description? In any case, this dragged got out, and it's late in -rc cycle for 3.0, so I was planning on queuing this for the next merge window. (Sorry for that, this was mostly due to my not having enough time to really dive into the issues involved.) - Ted