From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [heads-up] mknod() broken on nfs4
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 06:37:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110623053745.GJ11521@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110622231946.GH11521@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:19:46AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> It always worked that way, all the way back to Unix v6 (and I'm fairly sure
> to earlier than that; don't have v5 kernel source, unfortunately). Worked
> that way in Linux since 0.02/0.03/0.10, when Linus first added mknod(2)
> (presumably 0.01 had been tested with /dev populated by Minix ;-)
>
> As for POSIX, what it says is
> The only portable use of mknod() is to create a FIFO-special file.
> If mode is not S_IFIFO or dev is not 0, the behaviour of mknod() is
> unspecified.
> and we support it for all non-directories. Always had...
>
> Note that the right thing to do is to issue CLOSE and _not_ call
> lookup_instantiate_filp() if we are called from sys_mknodat(). We don't
> want to leak stateid...
OK... See #untested in vfs-2.6.git; the last 5 commits there. The actual
fixes are in the last one; to get rid of the dependency on the previous
we'd just need to pass open_flags as additional argument to
nameidata_to_nfs_open_context() (like untested@{1}, but without removal
of nameidata argument - that part depends on earlier commits and is, IMO,
a good idea anyway).
It seems to work here. Testing and comments would be welcome...
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-23 5:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-21 23:59 [heads-up] mknod() broken on nfs4 Al Viro
2011-06-22 0:23 ` Al Viro
[not found] ` <20110622002359.GC11521-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-22 23:00 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <1308783620.25875.30.camel-SyLVLa/KEI9HwK5hSS5vWB2eb7JE58TQ@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-22 23:19 ` Al Viro
2011-06-23 2:48 ` Al Viro
2011-06-23 5:37 ` Al Viro [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110623053745.GJ11521@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).