From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, hch@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 18:38:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110629163825.GE17590@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309275310-10987-1-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com>
On Tue 28-06-11 11:35:10, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Btrfs needs to be able to control how filemap_write_and_wait_range() is called
> in fsync to make it less of a painful operation, so push down taking i_mutex and
> the calling of filemap_write_and_wait() down into the ->fsync() handlers. Some
> file systems can drop taking the i_mutex altogether it seems, like ext3 and
> ocfs2. For correctness sake I just pushed everything down in all cases to make
> sure that we keep the current behavior the same for everybody, and then each
> individual fs maintainer can make up their mind about what to do from there.
> Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
...
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 1921392..fa44df8 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1758,7 +1758,7 @@ extern int ext4_htree_store_dirent(struct file *dir_file, __u32 hash,
> extern void ext4_htree_free_dir_info(struct dir_private_info *p);
>
> /* fsync.c */
> -extern int ext4_sync_file(struct file *, int);
> +extern int ext4_sync_file(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int);
> extern int ext4_flush_completed_IO(struct inode *);
>
> /* hash.c */
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> index ce66d2f..afab2e4 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)
> * i_mutex lock is held when entering and exiting this function
> */
>
> -int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, int datasync)
> +int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
> {
> struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
> struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
> @@ -178,15 +178,22 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, int datasync)
>
> trace_ext4_sync_file_enter(file, datasync);
>
> + ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, start, end);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> +
> if (inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
> - return 0;
> + goto out;
>
> ret = ext4_flush_completed_IO(inode);
> if (ret < 0)
> goto out;
>
> if (!journal) {
> - ret = generic_file_fsync(file, datasync);
> + if (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY ||
> + (datasync && (inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC)))
> + ret = sync_inode_metadata(inode, 1);
Umm, how did you get to this change? It is actually wrong - ext4 in
nojournal mode really seems to need to call generic_file_fsync() (so that
sync_buffers_list() is called).
> if (!ret && !list_empty(&inode->i_dentry))
> ret = ext4_sync_parent(inode);
> goto out;
> @@ -220,6 +227,7 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, int datasync)
> if (needs_barrier)
> blkdev_issue_flush(inode->i_sb->s_bdev, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
> out:
> + mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> trace_ext4_sync_file_exit(inode, ret);
> return ret;
> }
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-28 15:35 [PATCH] fs: push i_mutex and filemap_write_and_wait down into ->fsync() handlers Josef Bacik
2011-06-29 16:38 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-06-29 17:41 ` Josef Bacik
2011-06-29 17:05 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2011-07-04 8:54 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-07-19 10:24 ` Dave Chinner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-29 18:05 Josef Bacik
2011-06-29 18:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 18:14 ` Josef Bacik
2011-06-29 19:26 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-23 18:09 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-23 19:32 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-23 20:26 ` Josef Bacik
2011-07-23 20:38 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-23 22:02 ` Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-07-24 11:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-24 11:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-25 17:38 ` Ted Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110629163825.GE17590@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).