linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 18:24:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110630162457.GH28475@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110629145553.642570515@intel.com>

On Wed 29-06-11 22:52:46, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Pass struct wb_writeback_work all the way down to writeback_sb_inodes(),
> and initialize the struct writeback_control there.
> 
> struct writeback_control is basically designed to control writeback of a
> single file, but we keep abuse it for writing multiple files in
> writeback_sb_inodes() and its callers.
> 
> It immediately clean things up, e.g. suddenly wbc.nr_to_write vs
> work->nr_pages starts to make sense, and instead of saving and restoring
> pages_skipped in writeback_sb_inodes it can always start with a clean
> zero value.
> 
> It also makes a neat IO pattern change: large dirty files are now
> written in the full 4MB writeback chunk size, rather than whatever
> remained quota in wbc->nr_to_write.
> 
> Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> Proposed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
  Just one minor nit:

> @@ -570,17 +622,25 @@ static int writeback_sb_inodes(struct su
>  		iput(inode);
>  		cond_resched();
>  		spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
> -		if (wbc->nr_to_write <= 0)
> -			return 1;
> +		/*
> +		 * bail out to wb_writeback() often enough to check
> +		 * background threshold and other termination conditions.
> +		 */
> +		if (wrote) {
> +			if (jiffies - start_time > HZ / 10UL)
> +				break;
  I guess this comparison should use time_before() macro - or maybe even
time_is_before_jiffies().

> +			if (work->nr_pages <= 0)
> +				break;
> +		}
>  	}
> -	/* b_io is empty */
> -	return 1;
> +	return wrote;
>  }
>  
> -static void __writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
> -				  struct writeback_control *wbc)
> +static long __writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
> +				  struct wb_writeback_work *work)
>  {
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
> +	long wrote = 0;
>  
>  	while (!list_empty(&wb->b_io)) {
>  		struct inode *inode = wb_inode(wb->b_io.prev);
> @@ -590,33 +650,37 @@ static void __writeback_inodes_wb(struct
>  			requeue_io(inode, wb);
>  			continue;
>  		}
> -		ret = writeback_sb_inodes(sb, wb, wbc, false);
> +		wrote += writeback_sb_inodes(sb, wb, work);
>  		drop_super(sb);
>  
> -		if (ret)
> -			break;
> +		/* refer to the same tests at the end of writeback_sb_inodes */
> +		if (wrote) {
> +			if (jiffies - start_time > HZ / 10UL)
> +				break;
  And the same here.

> +			if (work->nr_pages <= 0)
> +				break;
> +		}
>  	}
>  	/* Leave any unwritten inodes on b_io */
> +	return wrote;
>  }
>  

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-30 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-29 14:52 [PATCH 0/9] write bandwidth estimation and writeback fixes v2 Wu Fengguang
2011-06-29 14:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] writeback: make writeback_control.nr_to_write straight Wu Fengguang
2011-06-30 16:24   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-07-01 12:03     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-29 14:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated written pages Wu Fengguang
2011-06-29 14:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] writeback: bdi write bandwidth estimation Wu Fengguang
2011-06-30 19:56   ` Jan Kara
2011-07-01 14:58     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-04  3:05       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-13 23:30       ` Jan Kara
2011-07-23  7:26         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-01 15:20   ` Andrea Righi
2011-07-08 11:53     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-01 18:32   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-23  8:02     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-07-01 19:19   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-01 19:29   ` Vivek Goyal
2011-07-23  8:07     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-29 14:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] writeback: show bdi write bandwidth in debugfs Wu Fengguang
2011-06-29 14:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] writeback: consolidate variable names in balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-06-30 17:26   ` Jan Kara
2011-06-29 14:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] writeback: introduce smoothed global dirty limit Wu Fengguang
2011-07-01 15:20   ` Andrea Righi
2011-07-08 11:51     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-06-29 14:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] writeback: introduce max-pause and pass-good dirty limits Wu Fengguang
2011-06-29 14:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] writeback: scale IO chunk size up to half device bandwidth Wu Fengguang
2011-06-29 14:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] writeback: trace global_dirty_state Wu Fengguang
2011-07-01 15:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-01 15:45     ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110630162457.GH28475@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).