From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
fengguang.wu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: Don't wait for completion in writeback_inodes_sb_nr
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:41:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110712104132.GA14189@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110712103453.GC31226@quack.suse.cz>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:34:53PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > All block device inodes sit on blockdev_superblock, we got rid of inodes
> > without a superblock long time ago.
> Sure, we can easily iterate also blockdev_superblock. What I meant is
> that blockdev_superblock will need a special handling since we otherwise
> ignore pseudo superblocks...
Pseudo superblocks aren't ignored. They are added to super_blocks like
all others, and iterate_supers doesn't skip over them. The problem
is that blockdev_superblock doesn't have a proper s_bdi set, and thus
gets skipped over by __sync_filesystem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-12 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-28 23:43 [PATCH] writeback: Don't wait for completion in writeback_inodes_sb_nr Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-06-29 0:54 ` Dave Chinner
2011-06-29 1:56 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-06-29 8:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 16:57 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-29 17:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 19:15 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-29 20:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-30 12:15 ` Jan Kara
2011-06-30 12:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-01 22:55 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-07-02 11:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-11 17:00 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-11 17:11 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-07-11 19:48 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-11 19:51 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-07-11 20:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-12 10:34 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-12 10:41 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-07-12 22:37 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-14 16:29 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-07-14 23:08 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-19 16:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-21 18:35 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-22 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-19 16:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-19 16:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-20 22:00 ` Jan Kara
2011-07-22 15:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 17:26 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-06-29 18:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 21:30 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-07-19 15:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-06-29 6:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110712104132.GA14189@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=curtw@google.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).