From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:40:08 -0400 Message-ID: <20110718154008.GA29593@infradead.org> References: <20110717105027.53cc3ca4@kryten> <20110717010427.GC5359@parisc-linux.org> <20110717084630.GC8006@one.firstfloor.org> <1310977028.5756.1.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , Matthew Wilcox , Anton Blanchard , npiggin@kernel.dk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Tim Chen To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:56400 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751191Ab1GRPk1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 11:40:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1310977028.5756.1.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:17:08AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Tim posted a patch, but it wasn't applied for unknown reasons. > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/13/561 > > > > Could Tim respin his patch then ? Btw, it seems like most kern_mount users want this and he's still missing some like devtmpfs, sysfs or ipc. What about splitting kern_mount into a variant that gets a long-term reference for these callers, and one that doesn't for afs/cifs/nfs automounts?