linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>,
	npiggin@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:51:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110718155141.GA11013@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110718154008.GA29593@infradead.org>

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:40:08AM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:17:08AM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Tim posted a patch, but it wasn't applied for unknown reasons.
> > > 
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/13/561
> > > 
> > 
> > Could Tim respin his patch then ?
> 
> Btw, it seems like most kern_mount users want this and he's still
> missing some like devtmpfs, sysfs or ipc.  What about splitting
> kern_mount into a variant that gets a long-term reference for these
> callers, and one that doesn't for afs/cifs/nfs automounts?

	Careful - we need to balance that on shutdown side with
mnt_make_shortterm() before the final mntput()...  Making it too
easy just on the kern_mount side will lead to easy-to-miss bugs.
For one thing, it's visible only on SMP boxen; for another there's
a lot of such internal vfsmounts (pipefs, sockets, etc.) that
are never shut down, so there'll be no easily copied examples of
what should not be forgotten on __exit side of things in obvious
places...

	FWIW, I had missed the original posting back in April - had been
without net.access then and it hadn't been resent when I came back, asked
people to resend the important ones and shitcanned the huge pile of pending
mail from the previous month...

  reply	other threads:[~2011-07-18 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-17  0:50 vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box Anton Blanchard
2011-07-17  1:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2011-07-17  8:46   ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-18  8:17     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-18 15:40       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-18 15:51         ` Al Viro [this message]
2011-07-19 16:32           ` [Patch] VFS : mount lock scalability for files systems without mount point (WAS vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box) Tim Chen
2011-07-21 20:40             ` Al Viro
2011-07-22  0:27               ` Tim Chen
2011-07-23 13:24                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-25 22:39                   ` Tim Chen
2011-07-25 22:51                     ` Al Viro
2011-07-25 23:22                       ` Tim Chen
2011-07-26  6:00                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-26  8:21                           ` [PATCH] vfs: dont chain pipe/anon/socket on superblock s_inodes list Eric Dumazet
2011-07-26  9:03                             ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26  9:36                               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-26  9:42                                 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 10:43                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-07-26 11:49                                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-27 15:21                                 ` [PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists Eric Dumazet
2011-07-27 17:12                                   ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-27 20:44                                   ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-27 20:59                                     ` Andi Kleen
2011-07-27 21:01                                       ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-28  4:11                                         ` [PATCH] vfs: conditionally call inode_wb_list_del() Eric Dumazet
2011-07-28  4:41                                     ` [PATCH] vfs: avoid taking locks if inode not in lists Eric Dumazet
2011-07-28  4:55                                     ` [PATCH] vfs: avoid call to inode_lru_list_del() if possible Eric Dumazet
2011-07-18 16:41   ` vfsmount lock issues on very large ppc64 box Tim Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110718155141.GA11013@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=npiggin@kernel.dk \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).