From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [git pull] vfs and fs patches for 3.1, part 1 Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2011 02:27:12 +0100 Message-ID: <20110723012712.GG31405@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20110723000131.GE31405@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds Return-path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:56507 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750761Ab1GWB1N (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2011 21:27:13 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 05:54:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > *Most*, but not all, of the commits you list seem to exist in the > for-next branch. The rest is a build fix from Randy + obvious ERR_CAST-instead-of-cast + isofs lock removal + a couple of IN_DELETE_SELF fixes that should've gone in last cycle... > Which is identical to the "untested" branch, so that, together with > the "not everything listed in your shortlog is there" makes me not get > the warm and fuzzies. #untested == #master in my local tree, no more than that... My apologies about the forgotten push.