From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: hch@infradead.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Improve writeout pattern from xfs_flush_pages()
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 17:42:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110803214206.GA20477@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1312404545-15400-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz>
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 10:49:03PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> at one of customer's machines, I've spotted an issue that sync(1) called
> after writing a single huge file has been achieving rather low throughput. After
> debugging this with blktrace, I've found that the culprit was in flusher thread
> racing with page writeout happening from XFS sync code. The patches below helped
> that case. Although they are not a complete solution, I belive they are useful
> anyway so please consider merging them...
We currently have three calls to xfs_flush_pages with XBF_ASYNC set:
- xfs_setattr_size
- xfs_sync_inode_data
- xfs_release
The first one actually is a synchronous writeout, just implemented in
a rather odd way by doing the xfs_ioend_wait right after it, so your
change is actively harmful for it. The second is only called from
xfs_flush_worker, which is the workqueue offload when we hit ENOSPC.
I can see how this might race with the writeback code, but the correct
fix is to replace it with a call to writeback_inodes_sb(_if_idle)
on that one is fixed to do a trylock on s_umount and thus won't
deadlock. The third one is opportunistic writeout if a file got
truncated down on final release. filemap_flush probably is fine
here, but there's no need for a range version. If you replace it
with filemap_flush please also kill the useless wrapper while you're
at it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-03 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-03 20:49 [PATCH 0/2] Improve writeout pattern from xfs_flush_pages() Jan Kara
2011-08-03 20:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: Create filemap_flush_range() Jan Kara
2011-08-03 20:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Call filemap_flush_range() for async xfs_flush_pages() call Jan Kara
2011-08-03 22:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-03 22:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-04 10:03 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-03 21:42 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2011-08-04 10:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] Improve writeout pattern from xfs_flush_pages() Jan Kara
2011-08-04 10:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-04 12:07 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-04 12:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-04 12:37 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-04 12:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110803214206.GA20477@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).