From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] xfstests: make more tests generic Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:33:22 -0400 Message-ID: <20110810163322.GA30292@infradead.org> References: <20110810155214.GE20461@twin.jikos.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Behrens Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:43995 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753173Ab1HJQdY (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Aug 2011 12:33:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110810155214.GE20461@twin.jikos.cz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 05:52:14PM +0200, David Sterba wrote: > there's a hardcoded path for mkfs.btrfs in common.rc:_scratch_mkfs_sized() > > 335 btrfs) > 336 /sbin/mkfs.$FSTYP $MKFS_OPTIONS $SCRATCH_DEV -b $fssize > 337 ;; > > I have a /usr/local/ installation of btrfsprogs from git, > _scratch_mkfs_sized() was not called for btrfs before. > > Possible ways to fix this: > 1) use /sbin/mkfs -t $FSTYP like _scratch_mkfs, or > 2) set $MKFS_BTRFS_PROG like for some other filesystems > > > What is preferred? Please send a patch for variant 2. As soon as we have option using the generic mkfs wrapper sounds like a good idea. In addition to that treating btrfs the same way as other filesystems is always good.