From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Andrea Righi <andrea@betterlinux.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] writeback: per task dirty rate limit
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:21:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110815142141.GC23601@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110813162826.GA1646@thinkpad>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1759 bytes --]
Andrea,
> > @@ -1158,6 +1160,15 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
> > if (bdi->dirty_exceeded)
> > ratelimit = 8;
> >
> > + preempt_disable();
> > + p = &__get_cpu_var(dirty_leaks);
> > + if (*p > 0 && current->nr_dirtied < ratelimit) {
> > + nr_pages_dirtied = min(*p, ratelimit - current->nr_dirtied);
> > + *p -= nr_pages_dirtied;
> > + current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied;
> > + }
> > + preempt_enable();
> > +
>
> I think we are still leaking some dirty pages, when the condition is
> false nr_pages_dirtied is just ignored.
>
> Why not doing something like this?
>
> current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied;
You must mean the above line. Sorry I failed to provide another patch
before this one (attached this time). With that preparation patch, it
effectively become equal to the logic below :)
> if (current->nr_dirtied < ratelimit) {
> p = &get_cpu_var(dirty_leaks);
> if (*p > 0) {
> nr_pages_dirtied = min(*p, ratelimit -
> current->nr_dirtied);
> *p -= nr_pages_dirtied;
> } else
> nr_pages_dirtied = 0;
> put_cpu_var(dirty_leaks);
>
> current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied;
> }
Thanks,
Fengguang
> > if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit))
> > balance_dirty_pages(mapping, current->nr_dirtied);
> > }
> > --- linux-next.orig/kernel/exit.c 2011-08-08 21:43:37.000000000 +0800
> > +++ linux-next/kernel/exit.c 2011-08-08 21:45:58.000000000 +0800
> > @@ -1039,6 +1039,8 @@ NORET_TYPE void do_exit(long code)
> > validate_creds_for_do_exit(tsk);
> >
> > preempt_disable();
> > + if (tsk->nr_dirtied)
> > + __this_cpu_add(dirty_leaks, tsk->nr_dirtied);
> > exit_rcu();
> > /* causes final put_task_struct in finish_task_switch(). */
> > tsk->state = TASK_DEAD;
[-- Attachment #2: writeback-accurate-task-dirtied.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1226 bytes --]
Subject: writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes
Date: Thu Apr 14 07:52:37 CST 2011
When dd in 512bytes, generic_perform_write() calls
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited() 8 times for the same page, but
obviously the page is only dirtied once.
Fix it by accounting nr_dirtied at page dirty time.
This will allow further simplification of the
balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr() calls.
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
mm/page-writeback.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-15 22:12:14.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-15 22:12:27.000000000 +0800
@@ -1211,8 +1211,6 @@ void balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr(
else
ratelimit = min(ratelimit, 32 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10));
- current->nr_dirtied += nr_pages_dirtied;
-
preempt_disable();
/*
* This prevents one CPU to accumulate too many dirtied pages without
@@ -1711,6 +1709,7 @@ void account_page_dirtied(struct page *p
__inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info, BDI_DIRTIED);
task_dirty_inc(current);
task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
+ current->nr_dirtied++;
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(account_page_dirtied);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 128+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-06 8:44 [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v8 Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 13:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 22:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 12:28 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 23:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 17:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 22:34 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-11 2:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-11 11:14 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-16 8:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 13:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 21:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-16 8:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-11 22:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 2:43 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 3:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 5:45 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 9:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 11:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 9:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 11:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 12:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-12 13:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-12 14:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-22 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-23 3:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-23 10:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-23 14:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-23 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-24 0:12 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-24 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 0:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 9:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 10:04 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 10:52 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 12:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 13:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 13:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 13:24 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-24 18:00 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-25 3:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-25 22:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-26 1:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 9:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-29 13:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-29 13:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-02 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-25 5:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-23 14:36 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 2:08 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-16 8:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 14:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-11 3:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 14:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 11:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-15 14:08 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 15:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-09 16:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 14:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 14:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-15 14:11 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 16:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 14:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 17:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 14:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 14:35 ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-07 6:19 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 14:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 23:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-08 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-08 22:38 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-13 16:28 ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-15 14:21 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-08-15 14:26 ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-09 17:46 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-10 3:29 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 18:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-11 0:55 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 18:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 3:40 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 10:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 11:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 8:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 14:48 ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-07 6:44 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-06 16:46 ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-07 7:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-07 9:50 ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-09 18:15 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 18:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-10 3:22 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-10 3:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 19:16 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-10 4:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-09 2:01 ` [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v8 Vivek Goyal
2011-08-09 5:55 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-09 14:04 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-10 7:41 ` Greg Thelen
2011-08-10 18:40 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-11 3:21 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-11 20:42 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-08-11 21:00 ` Vivek Goyal
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-16 2:20 [PATCH 0/5] IO-less dirty throttling v9 Wu Fengguang
2011-08-16 2:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-16 7:17 ` Andrea Righi
2011-08-16 7:22 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110815142141.GC23601@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrea@betterlinux.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).