From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] writeback: Add writeback stats for pages written
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:10:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110816131019.GA23416@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO81RMbpK4ZE=4c5khSrGpzDrXbyynWp8QoFbUjMuHFeJtbDDw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Curt,
On Mon 15-08-11 11:56:08, Curt Wohlgemuth wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> > Regarding congestion_wait() statistics - do I get right that the numbers
> > gathered actually depend on the number of threads using the congested
> > device? They are something like
> > \sum_{over threads} time_waited_for_bdi
> > How do you interpret the resulting numbers then?
>
> I don't have it by thread; just stupidly as totals, like this:
>
> calls: ttfp 11290
> time: ttfp 558191
> calls: shrink_inactive_list isolated xxx
> time : shrink_inactive_list isolated xxx
> calls: shrink_inactive_list lumpy reclaim xxx
> time : shrink_inactive_list lumpy reclaim xxx
> calls: balance_pgdat xxx
> time : balance_pgdat xxx
> calls: alloc_pages_high_priority xxx
> time : alloc_pages_high_priority xxx
> calls: alloc_pages_slowpath xxx
> time : alloc_pages_slowpath xxx
> calls: throttle_vm_writeout xxx
> time : throttle_vm_writeout xxx
> calls: balance_dirty_pages xxx
> time : balance_dirty_pages xxx
Yes, that's what I was expecting.
> Note that the "call" points above are from a very old (2.6.34 +
> backports) kernel, but you get the idea. We just wrap
> congestion_wait() with a routine that takes a 'type' parameter; does
> the congestion_wait(); and increments the appropriate 'call' stat, and
> adds to the appropriate 'time' stat the return value from
> congestion_wait().
OK I see. I imagine that could be useful when you are monitoring your
systems or doing some long term observations.
> For a given workload, you can get an idea for where congestion is
> adding to delays. I really think that for IO-less
> balance_dirty_pages(), we need some insight into how long writer
> threads are being throttled. And tracepoints are great, but not
> sufficient, IMHO.
Well, we are going to report computed delays via tracepoints which are
going to be prime interface for debugging but I agree that some statistics
could be useful as well and more lightweight (no need to pass lots of trace
data to userspace). OTOH I wonder if we shouldn't write a userspace tool
processing trace information from balance_dirty_pages() and generating
exactly those statistics you want in the kernel - something like writeback
tracer...
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-16 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-12 22:47 [PATCH 1/2 v2] writeback: Add a 'reason' to wb_writeback_work Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-08-12 22:47 ` [PATCH 2/2 v2] writeback: Add writeback stats for pages written Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-08-15 13:48 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-15 17:16 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-08-15 18:40 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-15 18:56 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-08-16 13:10 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-08-16 12:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-15 15:03 ` Jan Kara
2011-08-15 17:24 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
2011-08-16 12:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-15 13:19 ` [PATCH 1/2 v2] writeback: Add a 'reason' to wb_writeback_work Wu Fengguang
2011-09-28 15:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-07 15:28 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-07 18:07 ` Curt Wohlgemuth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110816131019.GA23416@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=curtw@google.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mrubin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).