From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@parallels.com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
containers@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>,
Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>, Oren Laadan <orenl@cs.columbia.edu>,
Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>,
LINUXFS-ML <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend] vfs: Add ->statfs callback for pipefs
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 01:23:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110824012328.f7bfc68a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110824080924.GG29452@sun>
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:09:24 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
>
> This is done to make it possible to distinguish pipes
> from fifos when opening one via /proc/<pid>/fd/ link.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>
> ---
> fs/pipe.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> Any objections to this one? It was a part of a patchset
> but can be treated independently so I'm re-sending it alone.
>
> Index: linux-2.6.git/fs/pipe.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.git.orig/fs/pipe.c
> +++ linux-2.6.git/fs/pipe.c
> @@ -1254,6 +1254,7 @@ out:
>
> static const struct super_operations pipefs_ops = {
> .destroy_inode = free_inode_nonrcu,
> + .statfs = simple_statfs,
> };
>
> /*
OK, I give up - how does it work?
<goes off and reads the kernel>
So it appears that the statfs call would previously return -ENOSYS, but
with this change the statfs will succeed and userspace can then inspect
f_type. Yes? I will fix your changelog by adding a description along these
lines.
And I'll ask you to fix it further by telling us why we want to do
this? The kernel has had this issue for a long time - why does it now
matter?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-24 8:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-24 8:09 [PATCH resend] vfs: Add ->statfs callback for pipefs Cyrill Gorcunov
2011-08-24 8:23 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2011-08-24 8:30 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
[not found] ` <20110824012328.f7bfc68a.akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-24 8:33 ` Pavel Emelyanov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110824012328.f7bfc68a.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=jbottomley@parallels.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ntl@pobox.com \
--cc=orenl@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=serge.hallyn@canonical.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xemul@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).