linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:05:43 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110826120543.GA26666@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110826114619.531760091@intel.com>

> -		pause = (HZ * pages_dirtied) / (task_ratelimit | 1);
> +		period = (HZ * pages_dirtied) / (task_ratelimit | 1);
> +		pause = current->dirty_paused_when + period - now;
> +		/*
> +		 * For less than 1s think time (ext3/4 may block the dirtier
> +		 * for up to 800ms from time to time on 1-HDD; so does xfs,
> +		 * however at much less frequency), try to compensate it in
> +		 * future periods by updating the virtual time; otherwise just
> +		 * do a reset, as it may be a light dirtier.
> +		 */
> +		if (unlikely(pause <= 0)) {
> +			if (pause < -HZ) {
> +				current->dirty_paused_when = now;
> +				current->nr_dirtied = 0;
> +			} else if (period) {
> +				current->dirty_paused_when += period;
> +				current->nr_dirtied = 0;
> +			}

> +			pause = 1; /* avoid resetting nr_dirtied_pause below */

Note: the above comment is only effective with the planned max pause
time adaption patch.

Thanks,
Fengguang

> +			break;
> +		}
>  		pause = min(pause, (long)MAX_PAUSE);
>  
>  pause:
>  		__set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
>  		io_schedule_timeout(pause);
>  
> +		current->dirty_paused_when = now + pause;
> +		current->nr_dirtied = 0;
> +
>  		dirty_thresh = hard_dirty_limit(dirty_thresh);
>  		/*
>  		 * max-pause area. If dirty exceeded but still within this
> @@ -1017,7 +1046,6 @@ pause:
>  	if (!dirty_exceeded && bdi->dirty_exceeded)
>  		bdi->dirty_exceeded = 0;
>  
> -	current->nr_dirtied = 0;
>  	current->nr_dirtied_pause = dirty_poll_interval(nr_dirty, dirty_thresh);
>  
>  	if (writeback_in_progress(bdi))
> --- linux-next.orig/kernel/fork.c	2011-08-16 08:50:41.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/kernel/fork.c	2011-08-16 08:54:13.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1303,6 +1303,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
>  
>  	p->nr_dirtied = 0;
>  	p->nr_dirtied_pause = 128 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
> +	p->dirty_paused_when = 0;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Ok, make it visible to the rest of the system.
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-26 12:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-26 11:38 [PATCH 00/10] IO-less dirty throttling v10 Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 01/10] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 03/10] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 04/10] writeback: stabilize bdi->dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 12:59     ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:05   ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] writeback: trace balance_dirty_pages Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:07   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] writeback: trace dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] trace task_io Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110826120543.GA26666@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arighi@develer.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).