From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:05:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110826120543.GA26666@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110826114619.531760091@intel.com>
> - pause = (HZ * pages_dirtied) / (task_ratelimit | 1);
> + period = (HZ * pages_dirtied) / (task_ratelimit | 1);
> + pause = current->dirty_paused_when + period - now;
> + /*
> + * For less than 1s think time (ext3/4 may block the dirtier
> + * for up to 800ms from time to time on 1-HDD; so does xfs,
> + * however at much less frequency), try to compensate it in
> + * future periods by updating the virtual time; otherwise just
> + * do a reset, as it may be a light dirtier.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(pause <= 0)) {
> + if (pause < -HZ) {
> + current->dirty_paused_when = now;
> + current->nr_dirtied = 0;
> + } else if (period) {
> + current->dirty_paused_when += period;
> + current->nr_dirtied = 0;
> + }
> + pause = 1; /* avoid resetting nr_dirtied_pause below */
Note: the above comment is only effective with the planned max pause
time adaption patch.
Thanks,
Fengguang
> + break;
> + }
> pause = min(pause, (long)MAX_PAUSE);
>
> pause:
> __set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> io_schedule_timeout(pause);
>
> + current->dirty_paused_when = now + pause;
> + current->nr_dirtied = 0;
> +
> dirty_thresh = hard_dirty_limit(dirty_thresh);
> /*
> * max-pause area. If dirty exceeded but still within this
> @@ -1017,7 +1046,6 @@ pause:
> if (!dirty_exceeded && bdi->dirty_exceeded)
> bdi->dirty_exceeded = 0;
>
> - current->nr_dirtied = 0;
> current->nr_dirtied_pause = dirty_poll_interval(nr_dirty, dirty_thresh);
>
> if (writeback_in_progress(bdi))
> --- linux-next.orig/kernel/fork.c 2011-08-16 08:50:41.000000000 +0800
> +++ linux-next/kernel/fork.c 2011-08-16 08:54:13.000000000 +0800
> @@ -1303,6 +1303,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
>
> p->nr_dirtied = 0;
> p->nr_dirtied_pause = 128 >> (PAGE_SHIFT - 10);
> + p->dirty_paused_when = 0;
>
> /*
> * Ok, make it visible to the rest of the system.
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-26 12:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-26 11:38 [PATCH 00/10] IO-less dirty throttling v10 Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 01/10] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 03/10] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 04/10] writeback: stabilize bdi->dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 12:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:05 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] writeback: trace balance_dirty_pages Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] writeback: trace dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] trace task_io Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110826120543.GA26666@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arighi@develer.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).