linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] writeback: per task dirty rate limit
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 20:59:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110826125924.GA6014@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314363069.11049.3.camel@twins>

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 08:51:09PM +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 19:38 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > +       preempt_disable();
> >         /*
> > -        * Check the rate limiting. Also, we do not want to throttle real-time
> > -        * tasks in balance_dirty_pages(). Period.
> > +        * This prevents one CPU to accumulate too many dirtied pages without
> > +        * calling into balance_dirty_pages(), which can happen when there are
> > +        * 1000+ tasks, all of them start dirtying pages at exactly the same
> > +        * time, hence all honoured too large initial task->nr_dirtied_pause.
> >          */
> > -       preempt_disable();
> >         p =  &__get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits);
> 
> 	p = &get_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits);

Ah yeah.. I actually followed your suggestion, and then find we'll
eventually do two __get_cpu_var() calls here, one for bdp_ratelimits
and the other for dirty_leaks in a planned patch. So let's keep the
preempt_disable()/preempt_enable().

> > -       *p += nr_pages_dirtied;
> > -       if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit)) {
> > -               ratelimit = sync_writeback_pages(*p);
> > +       if (unlikely(current->nr_dirtied >= ratelimit))
> >                 *p = 0;
> > -               preempt_enable();
> > -               balance_dirty_pages(mapping, ratelimit);
> > -               return;
> > +       else {
> > +               *p += nr_pages_dirtied;
> > +               if (unlikely(*p >= ratelimit_pages)) {
> > +                       *p = 0;
> > +                       ratelimit = 0;
> > +               }
> >         }
> >         preempt_enable(); 
> 
> 	put_cpu_var(bdp_ratelimits);

ditto.

Thanks,
Fengguang

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-26 12:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-26 11:38 [PATCH 00/10] IO-less dirty throttling v10 Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 01/10] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 02/10] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 03/10] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 04/10] writeback: stabilize bdi->dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 05/10] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26 12:59     ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 06/10] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 07/10] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:05   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 08/10] writeback: trace balance_dirty_pages Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 12:07   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 09/10] writeback: trace dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-08-26 11:38 ` [PATCH 10/10] trace task_io Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110826125924.GA6014@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arighi@develer.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).