From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] writeback: fix BDI_WRITTEN accounting disturbing bdi->completions
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:52:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110902025255.GA28584@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110901162950.GD2070@quack.suse.cz>
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 12:29:50AM +0800, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 01-09-11 22:40:41, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > Peter,
> >
> > This is an amazing bug. I'm not sure how the accounting goes wrong in
> > some tricky way. But you can compare the exact bdi proportions pattern
> > before/after patch. The gray "bdi setpoint" lines are vastly different.
> >
> > ---
> > When increasing BDI_WRITTEN together with bdi->completions inside the
> > same local irq disabling block, bdi_thresh is found to go wild in the
> > 1 disk + 1 usb stick writeback test case. Fix it by moving BDI_WRITTEN
> > accounting out.
> I don't understand this - the patch is just NOP. The change in
> test_clear_page_writeback() does absolutely nothing and the change in
> bdi_writeout_inc() just changes:
> local_irq_save(flags);
> __inc_bdi_stat(bdi);
> __prop_inc_percpu_max(&vm_completions, &bdi->completions,
> bdi->max_prop_frac);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> to:
> local_irq_save(flags);
> __inc_bdi_stat(bdi);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> local_irq_save(flags);
> __prop_inc_percpu_max(&vm_completions, &bdi->completions,
> bdi->max_prop_frac);
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> So the difference must be in something else...
Yes you are right -- this patch is basically a NOP. I retried without
this patch and it's now working fine again. Something mysterious to
catch..
Thanks,
Fengguang
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-02 2:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-01 14:40 [PATCH] writeback: fix BDI_WRITTEN accounting disturbing bdi->completions Wu Fengguang
2011-09-01 16:29 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-02 2:52 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110902025255.GA28584@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).