linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@us.ibm.com>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>,
	Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>,
	Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Coly Li <colyli@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] ext4: Verify and calculate checksums for extent tree blocks
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:02:19 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110902190219.GI12086@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <26584BE9-B716-40D5-B3B4-8C5912869648@dilger.ca>

On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 12:40:06AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On 2011-08-31, at 6:31 PM, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > Calculate and verify the checksum for each extent tree block.  The checksum is
> > located immediately after the last ext4_extent in the block, which is typically
> > 4-8 bytes in size.
> 
> It would be more correct to write "... located in the space immediately
> following the last possible ext4_extent in the block."

Agreed.

> > Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h |   25 ++++++++++++++++++-
> > fs/ext4/extents.c      |   64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h b/fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h
> > index 095c36f..24b106a 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_extents.h
> > @@ -62,10 +62,22 @@
> > /*
> >  * ext4_inode has i_block array (60 bytes total).
> >  * The first 12 bytes store ext4_extent_header;
> > - * the remainder stores an array of ext4_extent.
> > + * the remainder stores an array of ext4_extent,
> > + * followed by ext4_extent_tail.
> >  */
> > 
> > /*
> > + * This is the extent tail on-disk structure.
> > + * All other extent structures are 12 bytes long.  It turns out that
> > + * block_size % 12 >= 4 for all valid block sizes (1k, 2k, 4k).
> > + * Therefore, this tail structure can be crammed into the end of the block
> > + * without having to rebalance the tree.
> > + */
> > +struct ext4_extent_tail {
> > +	__le32	et_checksum;	/* crc32c(uuid+inum+extent_block) */
> > +};
> 
> Did you do any analysis of extent blocks to see whether there is enough
> space in most extents to have a larger extent tail that stores the inode
> number and generation?  This would be the same as with some directory
> blocks needing to add a directory entry to hold the checksum.

With 12-byte structures we're guaranteed 4 bytes that can be inserted without
needing to change any on-disk structures.

Most extent blocks aren't full, and provided that you decrease eh_max, you
could free up 8 more bytes for extra info.  Of course then you'd have to write
code to rebalance the extent tree whenever you find a full extent block.

It's also possible that we could simply bake i_generation into the checksum
whenever we bake in i_inum.

> > +/*
> >  * This is the extent on-disk structure.
> >  * It's used at the bottom of the tree.
> >  */
> > @@ -101,6 +113,17 @@ struct ext4_extent_header {
> > 
> > #define EXT4_EXT_MAGIC		cpu_to_le16(0xf30a)
> > 
> > +#define EXT4_EXTENT_TAIL_OFFSET(hdr) \
> > +	(sizeof(struct ext4_extent_header) + \
> > +	 (sizeof(struct ext4_extent) * le16_to_cpu((hdr)->eh_max)))
> > +
> > +static inline struct ext4_extent_tail *
> > +find_ext4_extent_tail(struct ext4_extent_header *eh)
> 
> I don't really like using "find" in this function name, since it implies
> a search is needed.  Maybe a name like ext4_extent_tail_ptr()?

Ok.

--D

> > +{
> > +	return (struct ext4_extent_tail *)(((void *)eh) +
> > +					   EXT4_EXTENT_TAIL_OFFSET(eh));
> > +}
> > +
> > /*
> >  * Array of ext4_ext_path contains path to some extent.
> >  * Creation/lookup routines use it for traversal/splitting/etc.
> > diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > index 4ac4303..94f09ce 100644
> > --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
> > @@ -41,11 +41,57 @@
> > #include <linux/falloc.h>
> > #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> > #include <linux/fiemap.h>
> > +#include <linux/crc32c.h>
> > #include "ext4_jbd2.h"
> > #include "ext4_extents.h"
> > 
> > #include <trace/events/ext4.h>
> > 
> > +static __le32 ext4_extent_block_csum(struct inode *inode,
> > +				     struct ext4_extent_header *eh)
> > +{
> > +	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb);
> > +	__le32 inum = cpu_to_le32(inode->i_ino);
> > +	__u32 crc = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (!EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(inode->i_sb,
> > +		EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	crc = crc32c_le(~0, sbi->s_es->s_uuid, sizeof(sbi->s_es->s_uuid));
> > +	crc = crc32c_le(crc, (__u8 *)&inum, sizeof(inum));
> > +	crc = crc32c_le(crc, (__u8 *)eh, EXT4_EXTENT_TAIL_OFFSET(eh));
> > +	return cpu_to_le32(crc);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int ext4_extent_block_csum_verify(struct inode *inode,
> > +					 struct ext4_extent_header *eh)
> > +{
> > +	struct ext4_extent_tail *et;
> > +
> > +	if (!EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(inode->i_sb,
> > +		EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM))
> > +		return 1;
> > +
> > +	et = find_ext4_extent_tail(eh);
> > +	if (et->et_checksum != ext4_extent_block_csum(inode, eh))
> > +		return 0;
> > +	return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void ext4_extent_block_csum_set(struct inode *inode,
> > +				       struct ext4_extent_header *eh)
> > +{
> > +	struct ext4_extent_tail *et;
> > +
> > +	if (!EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(inode->i_sb,
> > +		EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_METADATA_CSUM))
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	et = find_ext4_extent_tail(eh);
> > +	et->et_checksum = ext4_extent_block_csum(inode, eh);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int ext4_split_extent(handle_t *handle,
> > 				struct inode *inode,
> > 				struct ext4_ext_path *path,
> > @@ -101,6 +147,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_dirty(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> > {
> > 	int err;
> > 	if (path->p_bh) {
> > +		ext4_extent_block_csum_set(inode, ext_block_hdr(path->p_bh));
> > 		/* path points to block */
> > 		err = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, inode, path->p_bh);
> > 	} else {
> > @@ -382,6 +429,12 @@ static int __ext4_ext_check(const char *function, unsigned int line,
> > 		error_msg = "invalid extent entries";
> > 		goto corrupted;
> > 	}
> > +	/* Verify checksum on non-root extent tree nodes */
> > +	if (ext_depth(inode) != depth &&
> > +	    !ext4_extent_block_csum_verify(inode, eh)) {
> > +		error_msg = "extent tree corrupted";
> > +		goto corrupted;
> > +	}
> > 	return 0;
> > 
> > corrupted:
> > @@ -922,6 +975,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_split(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> > 		le16_add_cpu(&neh->eh_entries, m);
> > 	}
> > 
> > +	ext4_extent_block_csum_set(inode, neh);
> > 	set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> > 	unlock_buffer(bh);
> > 
> > @@ -1000,6 +1054,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_split(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> > 				sizeof(struct ext4_extent_idx) * m);
> > 			le16_add_cpu(&neh->eh_entries, m);
> > 		}
> > +		ext4_extent_block_csum_set(inode, neh);
> > 		set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> > 		unlock_buffer(bh);
> > 
> > @@ -1098,6 +1153,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_grow_indepth(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> > 	else
> > 		neh->eh_max = cpu_to_le16(ext4_ext_space_block(inode, 0));
> > 	neh->eh_magic = EXT4_EXT_MAGIC;
> > +	ext4_extent_block_csum_set(inode, neh);
> > 	set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
> > 	unlock_buffer(bh);
> > 
> > @@ -2458,10 +2514,6 @@ ext4_ext_rm_leaf(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> > 		if (uninitialized && num)
> > 			ext4_ext_mark_uninitialized(ex);
> > 
> > -		err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, path + depth);
> > -		if (err)
> > -			goto out;
> > -
> > 		/*
> > 		 * If the extent was completely released,
> > 		 * we need to remove it from the leaf
> > @@ -2483,6 +2535,10 @@ ext4_ext_rm_leaf(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
> > 			le16_add_cpu(&eh->eh_entries, -1);
> > 		}
> > 
> > +		err = ext4_ext_dirty(handle, inode, path + depth);
> > +		if (err)
> > +			goto out;
> > +
> > 		ext_debug("new extent: %u:%u:%llu\n", block, num,
> > 				ext4_ext_pblock(ex));
> > 		ex--;
> > 
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-02 19:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-01  0:30 [PATCH v1 00/16] ext4: Add metadata checksumming Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:30 ` [PATCH 01/16] ext4: ext4_dx_add_entry should dirty directory metadata with the directory inode Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:30 ` [PATCH 02/16] ext4: ext4_rename should dirty dir_bh with the correct directory Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:30 ` [PATCH 03/16] ext4: ext4_mkdir should dirty dir_block with the parent inode Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:30 ` [PATCH 04/16] ext4: Create a new BH_Verified flag to avoid unnecessary metadata validation Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:31 ` [PATCH 05/16] ext4: Create a rocompat flag for extended metadata checksumming Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:31 ` [PATCH 06/16] ext4: Calculate and verify inode checksums Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  2:30   ` Andreas Dilger
2011-09-02 19:32     ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-02 22:02       ` Andreas Dilger
2011-09-05 17:57         ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:31 ` [PATCH 07/16] ext4: Create bitmap checksum helper functions Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:31 ` [PATCH 08/16] ext4: Calculate and verify checksums for inode bitmaps Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  4:49   ` Andreas Dilger
2011-09-02 19:18     ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-02 21:27       ` Andreas Dilger
2011-09-05 18:22         ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-05 18:27           ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-05 19:45           ` James Bottomley
2011-09-05 22:12             ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:31 ` [PATCH 09/16] ext4: Calculate and verify block bitmap checksum Darrick J. Wong
     [not found]   ` <2492E720-3316-4561-8C9C-BBC6E8670EAD@dilger.ca>
2011-09-02 19:08     ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-02 21:06       ` Andreas Dilger
2011-09-01  0:31 ` [PATCH 10/16] ext4: Verify and calculate checksums for extent tree blocks Darrick J. Wong
     [not found]   ` <26584BE9-B716-40D5-B3B4-8C5912869648@dilger.ca>
2011-09-02 19:02     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2011-09-01  0:31 ` [PATCH 11/16] ext4: Calculate and verify checksums for htree nodes Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:31 ` [PATCH 12/16] ext4: Calculate and verify checksums of directory leaf blocks Darrick J. Wong
     [not found]   ` <4D5D8FB2-0D8A-4D30-B6D8-51158395C1C9@dilger.ca>
2011-09-02 18:57     ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-02 20:52       ` Andreas Dilger
2011-09-05 18:30         ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:32 ` [PATCH 13/16] ext4: Calculate and verify checksums of extended attribute blocks Darrick J. Wong
     [not found]   ` <F4A42DCE-F91C-419B-9153-65A7EA91D241@dilger.ca>
2011-09-02 18:43     ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:32 ` [PATCH 14/16] ext4: Make inode checksum cover empty space Darrick J. Wong
     [not found]   ` <4540D5DB-53D9-4C33-BC6B-868870D42AF3@dilger.ca>
2011-09-02 18:42     ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:32 ` [PATCH 15/16] ext4: Calculate and verify superblock checksum Darrick J. Wong
     [not found]   ` <2882FBB2-797C-4D27-8569-B6826DD34F68@dilger.ca>
2011-09-02 18:40     ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-01  0:32 ` [PATCH 16/16] jbd2: Support CRC32C transaction checksums Darrick J. Wong
     [not found]   ` <99019900-30B1-450A-9620-E94371A30CC6@dilger.ca>
2011-09-02 18:31     ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-02 14:15 ` [PATCH v1 00/16] ext4: Add metadata checksumming Greg Freemyer
2011-09-02 18:22   ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-04 11:41     ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-09-04 16:54       ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-04 17:17         ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-09-04 17:44           ` Andi Kleen
2011-09-04 22:19             ` Martin K. Petersen
2011-09-05 18:55               ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-05 18:45       ` Darrick J. Wong
2011-09-06 12:59         ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110902190219.GI12086@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com \
    --to=djwong@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=colyli@gmail.com \
    --cc=jlbec@evilplan.org \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).