From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>
Cc: linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/18] block: add bdi flag to indicate risk of io queue underrun
Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 09:53:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110904020916.070059502@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110904015305.367445271@intel.com
[-- Attachment #1: blk-queue-underrun.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4432 bytes --]
Hurry it up when there are less than 3 async requests in the block io queue:
1) don't dirty throttle the current dirtier
2) wakeup the flusher for background writeout (XXX: the flusher may then
abort not being aware of the underrun)
When doing 1-dd write test with dirty_bytes=1MB, it increased the XFS
writeout throughput from 5MB/s to 55MB/s and increased disk utilization
from ~3% to ~85%. ext4 achieves almost the same. However btrfs is not
good: it only does 1MB/s normally, with sudden rushes to 10-60MB/s.
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
CC: Li Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/backing-dev.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/blkdev.h | 12 ++++++++++++
mm/page-writeback.c | 3 +++
4 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
--- linux-next.orig/block/blk-core.c 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/block/blk-core.c 2011-08-31 14:41:38.000000000 +0800
@@ -637,6 +637,10 @@ static void __freed_request(struct reque
{
struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
+ if (rl->count[sync] <= q->in_flight[sync] &&
+ rl->count[!sync] == 0)
+ blk_set_queue_underrun(q, sync);
+
if (rl->count[sync] < queue_congestion_off_threshold(q))
blk_clear_queue_congested(q, sync);
@@ -738,6 +742,9 @@ static struct request *get_request(struc
if (rl->count[is_sync] >= (3 * q->nr_requests / 2))
goto out;
+ if (rl->count[is_sync] >= q->in_flight[is_sync] + BLK_UNDERRUN_REQUESTS)
+ blk_clear_queue_underrun(q, is_sync);
+
rl->count[is_sync]++;
rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/blkdev.h 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/blkdev.h 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
@@ -699,6 +699,18 @@ static inline void blk_set_queue_congest
set_bdi_congested(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
}
+#define BLK_UNDERRUN_REQUESTS 3
+
+static inline void blk_clear_queue_underrun(struct request_queue *q, int sync)
+{
+ clear_bdi_underrun(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
+}
+
+static inline void blk_set_queue_underrun(struct request_queue *q, int sync)
+{
+ set_bdi_underrun(&q->backing_dev_info, sync);
+}
+
extern void blk_start_queue(struct request_queue *q);
extern void blk_stop_queue(struct request_queue *q);
extern void blk_sync_queue(struct request_queue *q);
--- linux-next.orig/include/linux/backing-dev.h 2011-08-31 10:27:11.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/include/linux/backing-dev.h 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ enum bdi_state {
BDI_sync_congested, /* The sync queue is getting full */
BDI_registered, /* bdi_register() was done */
BDI_writeback_running, /* Writeback is in progress */
+ BDI_async_underrun, /* The async queue is getting underrun */
BDI_unused, /* Available bits start here */
};
@@ -301,6 +302,23 @@ void set_bdi_congested(struct backing_de
long congestion_wait(int sync, long timeout);
long wait_iff_congested(struct zone *zone, int sync, long timeout);
+static inline void clear_bdi_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int sync)
+{
+ if (sync == BLK_RW_ASYNC)
+ clear_bit(BDI_async_underrun, &bdi->state);
+}
+
+static inline void set_bdi_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi, int sync)
+{
+ if (sync == BLK_RW_ASYNC)
+ set_bit(BDI_async_underrun, &bdi->state);
+}
+
+static inline int bdi_async_underrun(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
+{
+ return bdi->state & (1 << BDI_async_underrun);
+}
+
static inline bool bdi_cap_writeback_dirty(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
{
return !(bdi->capabilities & BDI_CAP_NO_WRITEBACK);
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-31 10:49:43.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c 2011-08-31 14:40:58.000000000 +0800
@@ -1067,6 +1067,9 @@ static void balance_dirty_pages(struct a
nr_dirty, bdi_thresh, bdi_dirty,
start_time);
+ if (unlikely(!dirty_exceeded && bdi_async_underrun(bdi)))
+ break;
+
dirty_ratelimit = bdi->dirty_ratelimit;
pos_ratio = bdi_position_ratio(bdi, dirty_thresh,
background_thresh, nr_dirty,
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-04 1:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-04 1:53 [PATCH 00/18] IO-less dirty throttling v11 Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 01/18] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 02/18] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-09-05 15:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 2:10 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-05 15:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 2:43 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 18:20 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-09-08 2:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-12 5:44 ` Nai Xia
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 03/18] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 11:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 04/18] writeback: stabilize bdi->dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 05/18] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-06 23:27 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-06 23:34 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 7:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 1:04 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 11:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 06/18] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 2:46 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 07/18] writeback: dirty ratelimit - think time compensation Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 08/18] writeback: trace dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 09/18] writeback: trace balance_dirty_pages Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 10/18] writeback: dirty position control - bdi reserve area Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 12:31 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-12 10:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-18 14:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-18 14:47 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-28 14:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-28 14:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29 3:32 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29 11:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-29 12:15 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-09-06 14:22 ` [PATCH 11/18] block: add bdi flag to indicate risk of io queue underrun Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 2:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 7:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 12/18] writeback: balanced_rate cannot exceed write bandwidth Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 13/18] writeback: limit max dirty pause time Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 14:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 2:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-12 10:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-18 14:23 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 14/18] writeback: control " Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 2:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-12 10:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 15/18] writeback: charge leaked page dirties to active tasks Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 16:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 9:06 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 0:17 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 9:37 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 16/18] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes Wu Fengguang
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 17/18] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on redirty Wu Fengguang
2011-09-06 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 0:22 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 1:18 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 6:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-07 8:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-07 16:42 ` Jan Kara
2011-09-07 16:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-08 8:51 ` Steven Whitehouse
2011-09-04 1:53 ` [PATCH 18/18] btrfs: fix dirtied pages accounting on sub-page writes Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 13:32 ` [PATCH 00/18] IO-less dirty throttling v11 Wu Fengguang
2011-09-07 19:14 ` Trond Myklebust
2011-09-28 14:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-29 4:11 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110904020916.070059502@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).