Re: [PATCH 1/7] BTRFS: Fix lseek return value for error

[Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>]

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:06:47PM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Introduced by 9a4327ca1f45f82edad7dc0a4e52ce9316e0950c

I think this should go to Chris/Linus ASAP.  But a slightly better
patch description wouldn't hurt either.

Also any reason you captialize BTRFS?

> 
> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/file.c |   13 +++++++------
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> index 3c3abff..7ec0a24 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c
> @@ -1818,19 +1818,17 @@ static loff_t btrfs_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  	case SEEK_DATA:
>  	case SEEK_HOLE:
>  		ret = find_desired_extent(inode, &offset, origin);
> -		if (ret) {
> -			mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> -			return ret;
> -		}
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto error;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (offset < 0 && !(file->f_mode & FMODE_UNSIGNED_OFFSET)) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> +		goto error;
>  	}
>  	if (offset > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes) {
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> +		goto error;
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Special lock needed here? */
> @@ -1841,6 +1839,9 @@ static loff_t btrfs_file_llseek(struct file *file, loff_t offset, int origin)
>  out:
>  	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
>  	return offset;
> +error:
> +	mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  const struct file_operations btrfs_file_operations = {
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
---end quoted text---