From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Subject: Re: breaking leases on metadata changes
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:16:16 -0400
Message-ID: <20110926161616.GD16044@fieldses.org>
References: <1316617097-21384-1-git-send-email-bfields@redhat.com>
	<4E7E2314.6000101@samba.org> <20110926141027.GB16044@fieldses.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@redhat.com>,
	samba-technical@lists.samba.org,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Stefan (metze) Metzmacher" <metze@samba.org>
Return-path: <samba-technical-bounces@lists.samba.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110926141027.GB16044@fieldses.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba-technical>,
	<mailto:samba-technical-request@lists.samba.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba-technical>
List-Post: <mailto:samba-technical@lists.samba.org>
List-Help: <mailto:samba-technical-request@lists.samba.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba-technical>,
	<mailto:samba-technical-request@lists.samba.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: samba-technical-bounces@lists.samba.org
Errors-To: samba-technical-bounces@lists.samba.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:10:27AM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> Anyway, if this is all correct then it sounds like v4 read delegations
> and level 2 oplocks may be more different than I'd thought.

By the way, another ignorant question: poking around SMB2 documentation
I see that there are both "oplocks" and "leases".  What's the
relationship between them, and which of them should map to Linux leases?

--b.