linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	Andrea Righi <arighi@develer.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] nfs: scale writeback threshold proportional to dirty threshold
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 21:11:54 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111010131154.GB16847@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010131051.GA16847@localhost>

nfs_congestion_kb is to control the max allowed writeback and in-commit
pages. It's not reasonable for them to outnumber dirty and to-commit
pages. So each of them should not take more than 1/4 dirty threshold.

Considering that nfs_init_writepagecache() is called on fresh boot,
at the time dirty_thresh is much higher than the real dirty limit after
lots of user space memory consumptions, use 1/8 instead.

We might update nfs_congestion_kb when global dirty limit is changed
at runtime, but whatever, do it simple first.

CC: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
---
 fs/nfs/write.c      |   52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 mm/page-writeback.c |    6 ++++
 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

--- linux-next.orig/fs/nfs/write.c	2011-10-09 21:36:22.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/nfs/write.c	2011-10-10 21:05:07.000000000 +0800
@@ -1775,61 +1775,79 @@ int nfs_migrate_page(struct address_spac
 	set_page_private(newpage, (unsigned long)req);
 	ClearPagePrivate(page);
 	set_page_private(page, 0);
 	spin_unlock(&mapping->host->i_lock);
 	page_cache_release(page);
 out_unlock:
 	nfs_clear_page_tag_locked(req);
 out:
 	return ret;
 }
 #endif
 
-int __init nfs_init_writepagecache(void)
+void nfs_update_congestion_thresh(void)
 {
-	nfs_wdata_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nfs_write_data",
-					     sizeof(struct nfs_write_data),
-					     0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN,
-					     NULL);
-	if (nfs_wdata_cachep == NULL)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	nfs_wdata_mempool = mempool_create_slab_pool(MIN_POOL_WRITE,
-						     nfs_wdata_cachep);
-	if (nfs_wdata_mempool == NULL)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	nfs_commit_mempool = mempool_create_slab_pool(MIN_POOL_COMMIT,
-						      nfs_wdata_cachep);
-	if (nfs_commit_mempool == NULL)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	unsigned long background_thresh;
+	unsigned long dirty_thresh;
 
 	/*
 	 * NFS congestion size, scale with available memory.
 	 *
 	 *  64MB:    8192k
 	 * 128MB:   11585k
 	 * 256MB:   16384k
 	 * 512MB:   23170k
 	 *   1GB:   32768k
 	 *   2GB:   46340k
 	 *   4GB:   65536k
 	 *   8GB:   92681k
 	 *  16GB:  131072k
 	 *
 	 * This allows larger machines to have larger/more transfers.
 	 * Limit the default to 256M
 	 */
 	nfs_congestion_kb = (16*int_sqrt(totalram_pages)) << (PAGE_SHIFT-10);
 	if (nfs_congestion_kb > 256*1024)
 		nfs_congestion_kb = 256*1024;
 
+	/*
+	 * Limit to 1/8 dirty threshold, so that writeback+in_commit pages
+	 * won't overnumber dirty+to_commit pages.
+	 */
+	global_dirty_limits(&background_thresh, &dirty_thresh);
+	dirty_thresh <<= PAGE_SHIFT - 10;
+
+	if (nfs_congestion_kb > dirty_thresh / 8)
+		nfs_congestion_kb = dirty_thresh / 8;
+}
+
+int __init nfs_init_writepagecache(void)
+{
+	nfs_wdata_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nfs_write_data",
+					     sizeof(struct nfs_write_data),
+					     0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN,
+					     NULL);
+	if (nfs_wdata_cachep == NULL)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	nfs_wdata_mempool = mempool_create_slab_pool(MIN_POOL_WRITE,
+						     nfs_wdata_cachep);
+	if (nfs_wdata_mempool == NULL)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	nfs_commit_mempool = mempool_create_slab_pool(MIN_POOL_COMMIT,
+						      nfs_wdata_cachep);
+	if (nfs_commit_mempool == NULL)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	nfs_update_congestion_thresh();
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
 void nfs_destroy_writepagecache(void)
 {
 	mempool_destroy(nfs_commit_mempool);
 	mempool_destroy(nfs_wdata_mempool);
 	kmem_cache_destroy(nfs_wdata_cachep);
 }
 
--- linux-next.orig/mm/page-writeback.c	2011-10-09 21:36:06.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/mm/page-writeback.c	2011-10-10 21:05:07.000000000 +0800
@@ -138,34 +138,39 @@ static struct prop_descriptor vm_dirties
 static int calc_period_shift(void)
 {
 	unsigned long dirty_total;
 
 	if (vm_dirty_bytes)
 		dirty_total = vm_dirty_bytes / PAGE_SIZE;
 	else
 		dirty_total = (vm_dirty_ratio * determine_dirtyable_memory()) /
 				100;
 	return 2 + ilog2(dirty_total - 1);
 }
 
+void __weak nfs_update_congestion_thresh(void)
+{
+}
+
 /*
  * update the period when the dirty threshold changes.
  */
 static void update_completion_period(void)
 {
 	int shift = calc_period_shift();
 	prop_change_shift(&vm_completions, shift);
 	prop_change_shift(&vm_dirties, shift);
 
 	writeback_set_ratelimit();
+	nfs_update_congestion_thresh();
 }
 
 int dirty_background_ratio_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
 		void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp,
 		loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	int ret;
 
 	ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
 	if (ret == 0 && write)
 		dirty_background_bytes = 0;
 	return ret;
@@ -438,24 +443,25 @@ unsigned long bdi_dirty_limit(struct bac
 	bdi_writeout_fraction(bdi, &numerator, &denominator);
 
 	bdi_dirty = (dirty * (100 - bdi_min_ratio)) / 100;
 	bdi_dirty *= numerator;
 	do_div(bdi_dirty, denominator);
 
 	bdi_dirty += (dirty * bdi->min_ratio) / 100;
 	if (bdi_dirty > (dirty * bdi->max_ratio) / 100)
 		bdi_dirty = dirty * bdi->max_ratio / 100;
 
 	return bdi_dirty;
 }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(global_dirty_limits);
 
 /*
  * Dirty position control.
  *
  * (o) global/bdi setpoints
  *
  * We want the dirty pages be balanced around the global/bdi setpoints.
  * When the number of dirty pages is higher/lower than the setpoint, the
  * dirty position control ratio (and hence task dirty ratelimit) will be
  * decreased/increased to bring the dirty pages back to the setpoint.
  *
  *     pos_ratio = 1 << RATELIMIT_CALC_SHIFT

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-10 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-03 13:42 [PATCH 00/11] IO-less dirty throttling v12 Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 01/11] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 02/11] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 03/11] writeback: add bg_threshold parameter to __bdi_update_bandwidth() Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 04/11] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 05/11] writeback: stabilize bdi->dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 06/11] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 08/11] writeback: limit max dirty pause time Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 09/11] writeback: control " Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 10/11] writeback: dirty position control - bdi reserve area Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 11/11] writeback: per-bdi background threshold Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:59 ` [PATCH 00/11] IO-less dirty throttling v12 Wu Fengguang
2011-10-05  1:42   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-04 19:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-05 13:56   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-05 15:16   ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-10 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-10 13:07   ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-10 13:10     ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] nfs: writeback pages wait queue Wu Fengguang
2011-10-10 13:11       ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-10-18  8:53         ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] nfs: scale writeback threshold proportional to dirty threshold Wu Fengguang
2011-10-18  8:59           ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-20  2:49             ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-18  8:51       ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] nfs: writeback pages wait queue Wu Fengguang
2011-10-20  3:59         ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-10 14:28     ` [PATCH 00/11] IO-less dirty throttling v12 Wu Fengguang
2011-10-17  3:03       ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-20  3:39 ` Wu Fengguang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111010131154.GB16847@localhost \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arighi@develer.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=gthelen@google.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=minchan.kim@gmail.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).