From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Trond Myklebust
<Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
<a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Jan Kara <jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org>,
Dave Chinner <david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrea Righi <arighi-vWjgImWzx8FBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] IO-less dirty throttling v12
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 11:03:10 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111017030310.GA30011@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010142846.GA21218@localhost>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 13557 bytes --]
Hi Trond,
I enhanced the script to compare the write_bw as well as the NFS
write/commit stats.
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
(MB/s) 275.28 +28.5% 353.72 TOTAL write_bw
5649.00 +192.3% 16510.00 TOTAL nfs_nr_commits (*)
261987.00 +205.1% 799451.00 TOTAL nfs_nr_writes (*)
(MB) 866.52 -18.1% 709.85 TOTAL nfs_commit_size (**)
2.94 -44.8% 1.62 TOTAL nfs_write_size
(ms) 47814.05 -84.0% 7631.57 TOTAL nfs_write_queue_time
1405.05 -53.6% 652.59 TOTAL nfs_write_rtt_time
49237.94 -83.2% 8292.74 TOTAL nfs_write_execute_time
4320.98 -83.2% 726.27 TOTAL nfs_commit_queue_time
22943.13 -8.6% 20963.46 TOTAL nfs_commit_rtt_time
27307.42 -20.5% 21714.12 TOTAL nfs_commit_execute_time
(*) The x3 nfs_nr_writes and nfs_nr_commits numbers should be taken
with a salt because the total written bytes are increased at the
same time.
(**) The TOTAL nfs_commit_size mainly reflects the thresh=1G cases
because the numbers in the 10M/100M cases are very small
comparing to the 1G cases (as shown in the below case by case
values). Ditto for the *_time values. However the thresh=1G
cases should be most close to the typical NFS client setup, so
the values are still mostly representative numbers.
Below are the detailed case by case views. The script is attached,
which shows how exactly the numbers are calculated from mountstats.
Thanks,
Fengguang
---
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
20.89 +95.2% 40.77 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
39.43 +9.2% 43.07 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
26.60 +70.6% 45.39 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
12.70 +56.1% 19.83 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
27.41 +19.7% 32.81 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
26.52 +16.8% 30.97 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
40.70 +16.5% 47.42 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
45.28 -2.4% 44.20 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
35.74 +37.8% 49.26 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
275.28 +28.5% 353.72 TOTAL write_bw
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
825.00 +196.8% 2449.00 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
250.00 +6.8% 267.00 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
272.00 +114.7% 584.00 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
1477.00 +350.8% 6658.00 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
997.00 +115.8% 2152.00 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
1521.00 +154.3% 3868.00 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
235.00 +83.4% 431.00 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
29.00 +20.7% 35.00 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
43.00 +53.5% 66.00 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
5649.00 +192.3% 16510.00 TOTAL nfs_nr_commits
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
32294.00 -14.6% 27571.00 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
28858.00 +616.0% 206620.00 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
32593.00 +202.7% 98662.00 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
18937.00 +111.7% 40085.00 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
18762.00 +660.5% 142691.00 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
21473.00 +298.8% 85640.00 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
47281.00 +5.0% 49625.00 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
33108.00 +77.1% 58632.00 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
28681.00 +213.5% 89925.00 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
261987.00 +205.1% 799451.00 TOTAL nfs_nr_writes
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
7.69 -35.6% 4.95 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
47.41 -1.3% 46.81 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
29.39 -22.1% 22.90 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
2.73 -68.3% 0.87 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
8.24 -46.7% 4.39 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
5.21 -55.1% 2.34 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
56.99 -42.5% 32.79 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
453.65 -18.1% 371.54 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
255.21 -12.5% 223.26 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
866.52 -18.1% 709.85 TOTAL nfs_commit_size
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
0.20 +123.8% 0.44 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
0.41 -85.3% 0.06 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
0.25 -44.7% 0.14 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
0.21 -32.4% 0.14 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
0.44 -84.9% 0.07 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
0.37 -71.4% 0.11 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
0.28 +0.5% 0.28 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
0.40 -44.2% 0.22 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
0.38 -57.2% 0.16 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
2.94 -44.8% 1.62 TOTAL nfs_write_size
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
3249.09 -93.2% 222.32 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
221.23 +98.2% 438.48 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
5942.01 -68.7% 1857.66 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
285.75 -99.9% 0.38 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
6.21 -95.4% 0.28 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
34.73 -92.4% 2.63 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
29155.55 -99.3% 215.70 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
2704.81 -6.3% 2535.52 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
6214.66 -62.0% 2358.60 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
47814.05 -84.0% 7631.57 TOTAL nfs_write_queue_time
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
268.37 -69.6% 81.55 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
80.00 -38.0% 49.59 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
110.81 -50.8% 54.54 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
295.72 -41.7% 172.52 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
36.64 -31.6% 25.05 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
100.70 -33.5% 66.93 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
253.68 -67.2% 83.33 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
55.16 +46.4% 80.77 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
203.96 -81.2% 38.30 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
1405.05 -53.6% 652.59 TOTAL nfs_write_rtt_time
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
3517.58 -91.4% 304.13 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
302.26 +61.7% 488.90 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
6053.53 -68.4% 1912.75 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
581.52 -70.3% 173.00 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
42.99 -40.7% 25.47 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
135.56 -48.5% 69.75 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
29411.03 -99.0% 299.78 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
2768.01 -5.4% 2618.62 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
6425.46 -62.6% 2400.33 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
49237.94 -83.2% 8292.74 TOTAL nfs_write_execute_time
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
99.56 -97.5% 2.49 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
108.12 -83.8% 17.50 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
89.87 -97.5% 2.26 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
9.00 -90.5% 0.85 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
2.41 -58.2% 1.01 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
2.68 -59.9% 1.07 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
1398.01 -64.0% 503.61 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
1558.97 -97.9% 33.03 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
1052.37 -84.4% 164.45 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
4320.98 -83.2% 726.27 TOTAL nfs_commit_queue_time
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
896.68 -6.3% 840.25 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
919.00 +0.9% 926.98 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
1088.05 -24.0% 827.14 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
266.54 -22.7% 206.09 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
191.28 -41.3% 112.32 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
187.90 -34.0% 123.98 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
4671.46 -11.8% 4119.49 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
6586.97 -3.1% 6382.66 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
8135.26 -8.7% 7424.56 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
22943.13 -8.6% 20963.46 TOTAL nfs_commit_rtt_time
3.1.0-rc4-vanilla+ 3.1.0-rc8-nfs-wq+
------------------------ ------------------------
996.58 -15.4% 843.02 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
1027.14 -8.0% 944.51 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
1178.59 -29.6% 829.52 NFS-thresh=100M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-100M:10-X
275.75 -24.9% 207.03 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
193.71 -41.5% 113.35 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
190.67 -34.4% 125.12 NFS-thresh=10M/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-10M:10-X
6071.22 -23.8% 4624.14 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-10dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
8146.03 -21.2% 6415.71 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-1dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
9227.72 -17.5% 7611.71 NFS-thresh=1G/nfs-2dd-1M-32p-32768M-1024M:10-X
27307.42 -20.5% 21714.12 TOTAL nfs_commit_execute_time
[-- Attachment #2: compare.rb --]
[-- Type: application/x-ruby, Size: 6250 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-17 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-03 13:42 [PATCH 00/11] IO-less dirty throttling v12 Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 01/11] writeback: account per-bdi accumulated dirtied pages Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 02/11] writeback: dirty position control Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 03/11] writeback: add bg_threshold parameter to __bdi_update_bandwidth() Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 04/11] writeback: dirty rate control Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 05/11] writeback: stabilize bdi->dirty_ratelimit Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 06/11] writeback: per task dirty rate limit Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 07/11] writeback: IO-less balance_dirty_pages() Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 08/11] writeback: limit max dirty pause time Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 09/11] writeback: control " Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 10/11] writeback: dirty position control - bdi reserve area Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:42 ` [PATCH 11/11] writeback: per-bdi background threshold Wu Fengguang
2011-10-03 13:59 ` [PATCH 00/11] IO-less dirty throttling v12 Wu Fengguang
2011-10-05 1:42 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-04 19:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-05 13:56 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-05 15:16 ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-10 12:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-10 13:07 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-10 13:10 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] nfs: writeback pages wait queue Wu Fengguang
2011-10-10 13:11 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/2] nfs: scale writeback threshold proportional to dirty threshold Wu Fengguang
2011-10-18 8:53 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-18 8:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-20 2:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-18 8:51 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/2] nfs: writeback pages wait queue Wu Fengguang
2011-10-20 3:59 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-10 14:28 ` [PATCH 00/11] IO-less dirty throttling v12 Wu Fengguang
2011-10-17 3:03 ` Wu Fengguang [this message]
2011-10-20 3:39 ` Wu Fengguang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111017030310.GA30011@localhost \
--to=fengguang.wu-ral2jqcrhueavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org \
--cc=arighi-vWjgImWzx8FBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=david-FqsqvQoI3Ljby3iVrkZq2A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=gthelen-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hch-jcswGhMUV9g@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jack-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=minchan.kim-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vgoyal-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).