From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] writeback: Improve busyloop prevention
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:26:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111020222616.GA20542@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111020133938.GA18058@localhost>
On Thu 20-10-11 21:39:38, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:33:00PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:09:09PM +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > Jan,
> > >
> > > I tried the below combined patch over the ioless one, and find some
> > > minor regressions. I studied the thresh=1G/ext3-1dd case in particular
> > > and find that nr_writeback and the iostat avgrq-sz drops from time to time.
> > >
> > > I'll try to bisect the changeset.
>
> This is interesting, the culprit is found to be patch 1, which is
> simply
> if (work->for_kupdate) {
> oldest_jif = jiffies -
> msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_expire_interval * 10);
> - work->older_than_this = &oldest_jif;
> - }
> + } else if (work->for_background)
> + oldest_jif = jiffies;
Yeah. I had a look into the trace and you can notice that during the
whole dd run, we were running a single background writeback work (you can
verify that by work->nr_pages decreasing steadily). Without refreshing
oldest_jif, we'd write block device inode for /dev/sda (you can identify
that by bdi=8:0, ino=0) only once. When refreshing oldest_jif, we write it
every 5 seconds (kjournald dirties the device inode after committing a
transaction by dirtying metadata buffers which were just committed and can
now be checkpointed either by kjournald or flusher thread). So although the
performance is slightly reduced, I'd say that the behavior is a desired
one.
Also if you observed the performance on a really long run, the difference
should get smaller because eventually, kjournald has to flush the metadata
blocks when the journal fills up and we need to free some journal space and
at that point flushing is even more expensive because we have to do a
blocking write during which all transaction operations, thus effectively
the whole filesystem, are blocked.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-20 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-12 20:57 [PATCH 0/2 v4] writeback: Improve busyloop prevention and inode requeueing Jan Kara
2011-10-12 20:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] writeback: Improve busyloop prevention Jan Kara
2011-10-13 14:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-13 20:13 ` Jan Kara
2011-10-14 7:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-14 19:31 ` Chris Mason
[not found] ` <20111013143939.GA9691@localhost>
2011-10-13 20:18 ` Jan Kara
2011-10-14 16:00 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-14 16:28 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-18 0:51 ` Jan Kara
2011-10-18 14:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-19 11:56 ` Jan Kara
2011-10-19 13:25 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-19 13:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-19 13:35 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-20 12:09 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-20 12:33 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-20 13:39 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-20 22:26 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2011-10-22 4:20 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-24 15:45 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20111027063133.GA10146@localhost>
2011-10-27 20:31 ` Jan Kara
[not found] ` <20111101134231.GA31718@localhost>
2011-11-01 21:53 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-02 17:25 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <20111102185603.GA4034@localhost>
2011-11-03 1:51 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-03 14:52 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <20111104152054.GA11577@localhost>
2011-11-08 23:52 ` Jan Kara
2011-11-09 13:51 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-11-10 14:50 ` Jan Kara
2011-12-05 8:02 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-12-07 10:13 ` Jan Kara
2011-12-07 11:45 ` Wu Fengguang
[not found] ` <20111027064745.GA14017@localhost>
2011-10-27 20:50 ` Jan Kara
2011-10-20 9:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-10-20 15:32 ` Jan Kara
2011-10-15 12:41 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-12 20:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] writeback: Replace some redirty_tail() calls with requeue_io() Jan Kara
2011-10-13 14:30 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-10-13 14:15 ` [PATCH 0/2 v4] writeback: Improve busyloop prevention and inode requeueing Wu Fengguang
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-08 0:44 [PATCH 1/2] writeback: Improve busyloop prevention Jan Kara
2011-09-08 0:57 ` Wu Fengguang
2011-09-08 13:49 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111020222616.GA20542@quack.suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).