From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] writeback: requeue_io_wait() on pages_skipped inode Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 01:25:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20111020232520.GE20542@quack.suse.cz> References: <20111020152240.751936131@intel.com> <20111020153706.265653153@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , Christoph Hellwig , Michael Rubin , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton , LKML To: Wu Fengguang Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111020153706.265653153@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu 20-10-11 23:22:45, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Use requeue_io_wait() if some pages were skipped due to locked buffers. > > Cc: Dave Chinner > Cc: Michael Rubin > Cc: Peter Zijlstra > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu > Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang Two signed-off-by? Otherwise Acked-by: Jan Kara Honza > --- > fs/fs-writeback.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > --- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-10-20 22:42:24.000000000 +0800 > +++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c 2011-10-20 22:42:25.000000000 +0800 > @@ -618,11 +618,11 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct s > if (wbc.pages_skipped) { > /* > * writeback is not making progress due to locked > * buffers. Skip this inode for now. > */ > - redirty_tail(inode, wb); > + requeue_io_wait(inode, wb); > } > spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock); > spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock); > iput(inode); > cond_resched(); > > -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR