From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfstests: add fiemap operation to fsstress Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:55:34 -0400 Message-ID: <20111102195534.GB22500@infradead.org> References: <1319849297-3506-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <1319849297-3506-7-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, aelder@sgi.com, hch@lst.de, xfs@oss.sgi.com To: Dmitry Monakhov Return-path: Received: from 173-166-109-252-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([173.166.109.252]:53330 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750777Ab1KBTzf (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Nov 2011 15:55:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1319849297-3506-7-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 04:48:15AM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Related bug: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/118863 > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov This causes a very weird XFS failure in test 117 for me. While it obviously is an xfs bug that you uncovered (good!) I'm a bit worried about simply enabling operations in existing tests. Alex, Eric, Dave - should we add new tests with the new operations Dmitry added, or is adding new ops to the existing tests fine?